Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition Regarding Uniform Minimum Age of Marriage. Court Transferred Writ Petition from Delhi High Court After Learning Rajasthan Case Had Been Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard transfer petitions filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay and others seeking to transfer two writ petitions pending before different High Courts to the Supreme Court. The petitioners sought transfer of WP(C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before the Delhi High Court and CW/13784/2019 pending before the Rajasthan High Court. The underlying issue in the main proceedings concerned uniformity in the minimum age of marriage for men and women across diverse legislations. During the hearing, Dr. Manish Singhvi, senior counsel appearing for the respondents, informed the court that CW/13784/2019 had been dismissed for want of prosecution by the Rajasthan High Court. In this backdrop, the Supreme Court allowed the transfer petitions by transferring only WP(C) No 8905 of 2019 from the Delhi High Court to the Supreme Court. The court disposed of the transfer petitions in terms of the signed order and also disposed of any pending applications. The court issued notice in Writ Petition (C) No 551 of 2021, allowed intervention applications in SLP (Crl) No 10036/2022, and listed the transferred case along with other connected matters for hearing on February 13, 2023.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Transfer Petition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Petitioners sought transfer of WP(C) No 8905/2019 from Delhi High Court and CW/13784/2019 from Rajasthan High Court to Supreme Court - Court allowed transfer of Delhi case after learning Rajasthan case had been dismissed for want of prosecution - Held that transfer petition was allowed in terms of signed order (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to transfer writ petitions pending before Delhi High Court and Rajasthan High Court to the Supreme Court regarding uniformity in minimum age of marriage for men and women

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Allowed transfer petitions by transferring WP(C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before Delhi High Court to Supreme Court, disposed of transfer petitions in terms of signed order, disposed of pending applications, issued notice in Writ Petition (C) No 551 of 2021, allowed intervention applications in SLP (Crl) No 10036/2022, listed matters on 13 February 2023

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • jurisdiction
  • procedural disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (1) 28

Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos 1249-1250 of 2020

2023-01-13

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Rajhshekhar Rao, Areeb Amanullah, Mansi Sood, Zehra Khan, Tushar Mehta, Swarupama Chaturvedi, Shilp Agrawal, Saumya Kapoor, Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Sonia Mathur, Rashmi Singhania, Ankita Chaudhary, Praneet Pranav, Vandana Sharma, Suryaprakash V Raju, Rajat Nair, Rooh E Hina Dua, Digvijay Dam, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Gurmeet Singh Makker, Rooh E Hind Dua, Pratyush Srivastva, Dr. Manish Singhvi, Ashok Basoya, Sandeep Kumar Jha, Arpit Prakash, Vikalp Sharma, Gaurav Agrawal

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Etc.

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petitions seeking transfer of writ petitions from High Courts to Supreme Court

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking transfer of WP(C) No 8905/2019 from Delhi High Court and CW/13784/2019 from Rajasthan High Court to Supreme Court

Filing Reason

To address issue of uniformity in minimum age of marriage for men and women in diverse legislations

Previous Decisions

CW/13784/2019 had been dismissed for want of prosecution by Rajasthan High Court

Issues

Whether to transfer writ petitions pending before Delhi High Court and Rajasthan High Court to Supreme Court regarding uniformity in minimum age of marriage

Submissions/Arguments

Dr. Manish Singhvi stated that CW/13784/2019 had been dismissed for want of prosecution by Rajasthan High Court

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer petition can be allowed when one of the cases sought to be transferred has been dismissed, making transfer of remaining case appropriate for consolidated hearing

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners seek the transfer of WP (C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before the Delhi High Court and CW/13784/2019 pending before the Rajasthan High Court to this Court. The issue which is raised in the main proceedings pertains to uniformity in the minimum age of marriage for men and women in diverse legislations. Dr Manish Singhvi, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that CW/13784/2019 has been dismissed for want of prosecution by the Rajasthan High Court. In this backdrop, we allow the transfer petitions by transferring WP (C) No 8905 of 2019 pending before the Delhi High Court to this Court.

Procedural History

Transfer petitions filed before Supreme Court, hearing conducted on 13-01-2023, court allowed transfer of WP(C) No 8905/2019 from Delhi High Court after learning CW/13784/2019 had been dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition Regarding Uniform Minimum Age of Marriage. Court Transferred Writ Petition from Delhi High Court After Learning Rajasthan Case Had Been Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Overruled Precedent and Lack of Title. High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation...