Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal with No Order as to Costs. Court found no grounds to interfere with the lower court's judgment based on established legal precedent.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a civil appeal filed by the appellants against the respondents. The Supreme Court was asked to consider whether there were grounds to interfere with the judgment of the lower court. The appellants relied on the precedent set in the case of Abubakar Abdul Inamdar (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. vs. Harun Abdul Inamdar and Ors., (1995) 5 SCC 612, which was cited to support their position. After reviewing the arguments and the relevant legal principles, the court concluded that there were no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the court ordered that there would be no costs awarded in this matter. The decision was rendered by Justices Tarun Chatterjee and Aftab Alam on July 17, 2008.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Appeal Dismissal - Grounds for Interference - Not applicable - The court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment based on established legal precedent. The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs, affirming the lower court's decision (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there were grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and ordered no costs.

Law Points

  • Judicial precedent
  • appeal dismissal
  • costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (07) 164

Civil Appeal No.5396 of 1998

2008-07-17

Tarun Chatterjee, Aftab Alam

(1995) 5 SCC 612

BADESAHEB M.S.T.(D)BY PROS.L.RS. &ORS.

LALASAHEB F. TEHSILDAR (DEAD)BY LRS.&ORS.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against a judgment of a lower court.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to overturn the lower court's judgment.

Previous Decisions

The lower court's judgment was upheld.

Issues

Grounds for interference with the impugned judgment

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants cited legal precedent to support their appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the lower court's decision based on established legal precedent, affirming that no grounds existed for interference.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the law laid down by this Court in Abubakar Abdul Inamdar (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. vs. Harun Abdul Inamdar and Ors., (1995) 5 SCC 612, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned judgment.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the judgment of a lower court, which was subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Change of Investigating Agency in Cheating and Forgery Case, Directing Police to Complete Enquiry Within One Week. Court Exercises Its Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution to Ensure Ti...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute Over Fire Loss — Repudiation for Overvaluation and Lack of Licence Set Aside. The court held that while suppression of material fact regarding licence justified repudiation, overvaluation witho...