Supreme Court Appoints Administrator for Trust Management Amidst Dispute. Court intervened to ensure proper management of the Trust during litigation. The appointment of an Administrator was deemed necessary to secure the interests of the Trust and Institution.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the management of the Sayarbai Educational and Charitable Trust, founded by Shri Mittalal Jain in 1997. Following a series of appointments and disputes regarding the management, two suits were filed in 2007, leading to interim orders being sought by both parties. The appellant's request for an interim order was granted, while the respondent's was denied. However, the High Court later stayed the appellant's interim order, allowing the respondent to act as Chairman/Managing Trustee. In light of ongoing disputes, both parties suggested appointing a Receiver to manage the Trust until the suits were resolved. The Supreme Court appointed Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.P. Sivasubramanian as the Administrator, directing him to take charge by July 15, 2008, and to operate the Trust's bank accounts. The court emphasized that the pending suits should be resolved expeditiously, preferably within a year, without being influenced by the current order. The appeals were disposed of, and the High Court's order was set aside, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Trust Law - Appointment of Administrator - Management of Trust - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Court appointed an Administrator to manage the Trust and Institution due to ongoing disputes between the parties, ensuring the interests of the Trust are secured until the suits are resolved. Held that the Administrator shall assume charge and operate the Trust's affairs (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an administrator should be appointed to manage the Trust and Institution during ongoing litigation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court appointed Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.P. Sivasubramanian as the Administrator of the Trust and Institution, directing him to assume charge by July 15, 2008, and to operate the Trust's bank accounts. The court set aside the High Court's order and directed the pending suits to be resolved expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Trust management
  • appointment of administrator
  • interim orders
  • cooperation between parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (07) 22

Civil Appeal Nos. 4210-4211 of 2008

2008-07-02

Altamas Kabir, G.S. Singhvi

N. Sugalchand Jain

Mittalal Jain & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding management of a charitable trust and educational institution.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of an Administrator to manage the Trust and Institution.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose regarding the management of the Trust.

Previous Decisions

Interim orders were granted and stayed by the High Court.

Issues

Management of Trust during litigation Appointment of Administrator

Submissions/Arguments

Both parties suggested appointing a Receiver to manage the Trust. The appellant sought to maintain control over the Trust's management.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of appointing an Administrator to ensure the proper management of the Trust and Institution amidst ongoing disputes, highlighting the importance of securing the Trust's interests.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent No.1 herein, Shri Mittalal Jain, founded the Sayarbai Educational and Charitable Trust on 9th October, 1997. The Administrator shall assume charge of the affairs of the Trust and the Educational Institution on or before 15.7.2008. The appeals are disposed of. The impugned order of the High Court is set aside.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit in 2007, followed by the respondent's suit. Interim orders were sought, leading to appeals in the High Court, which were stayed. The Supreme Court intervened to appoint an Administrator.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Private Forests Act Case — Clarifies Definition of Private Forests. The court ruled that the company failed to prove that the claimed land was not a private forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assign...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Professor's Petition for Regular Pension — University Cannot Deny Pension for Non-Contributory Service Prior to Adoption of Pension Scheme. Denial of pension on ground of non-contributory service is arbitrary ...