Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Back Wages Due to Reinstatement. Court Grants Rs. 40,000 in Back Wages to Employee Following Reinstatement.

  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute regarding the payment of back wages to an employee, Nishan Singh, who had been reinstated by the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Punjab. The Supreme Court of India was approached through a Special Leave Petition concerning the limited issue of back wages after the employee's reinstatement. The court noted that the respondent had already been reinstated and that the only matter at hand was the payment of back wages. After hearing the arguments from both parties, the court decided to modify the order of the High Court, granting the respondent back wages amounting to Rs. 40,000. The court directed that this amount be paid within three months from the date of the order's copy being supplied to the respondent. Furthermore, it stipulated that the respondent could withdraw the amount without the need to furnish any security. The Special Leave Petition was thus disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Back Wages - Entitlement to Back Wages - Not applicable - The court modified the High Court's order to grant back wages of Rs. 40,000 to the respondent, which was to be paid within three months of the order. The court held that the respondent was entitled to withdraw the amount without furnishing any security (Paras 3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent is entitled to back wages following reinstatement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order to grant back wages of Rs. 40,000 to the respondent, to be paid within three months, allowing withdrawal without security.

Law Points

  • Reinstatement
  • Back wages
  • Modification of order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (08) 156

Special Leave Petition (C) No.222 of 2007

2008-08-08

Tarun Chatterjee, Aftab Alam

Pepsu Road Transport Corp., Punjab

Nishan Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding payment of back wages after reinstatement.

Remedy Sought

The respondent sought payment of back wages.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had issued an order regarding back wages.

Issues

Entitlement to back wages after reinstatement

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant contested the payment of back wages. The respondent claimed entitlement to back wages post-reinstatement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that upon reinstatement, the employee is entitled to back wages, and the modification of the High Court's order was necessary to ensure the employee received the owed amount.

Judgment Excerpts

The payment of back wages is stayed. We modify the order of the High Court only to the extent that the respondent shall be entitled to back wages for a total sum of Rs. 40,000/- from the appellant.

Procedural History

The Supreme Court issued notice on 22nd January 2007 regarding the payment of back wages and heard the parties before disposing of the Special Leave Petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Update Forest Land Records in PIL on Private Forest Acquisition. Court seeks districtwise information on mutation entries and disputed land under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Liability Established Despite Breach of Policy Terms. The court ruled that the insurer must compensate the victim while retaining the right to recover from the vehi...