Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. The court found that the tender documents constituted a valid arbitration agreement despite the absence of a formal signed contract.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute between a private company and a medical institute regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement following a tender for the supply of medical equipment. The appellant, M/s. Unissi (India) Pvt. Ltd., submitted a tender for Pulse Oxymeters, which was accepted by the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGI). Although the appellant signed an agreement containing an arbitration clause, the PGI did not sign it, leading to a dispute over payment for the supplied equipment. The PGI claimed no agreement existed and forfeited the earnest money. The appellant sought the appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11(4)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the Additional District Judge dismissed the application, stating no arbitration agreement was executed. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, noted that the tender documents included an arbitration clause and that the PGI had accepted the tender and used the equipment. The court found that an arbitration agreement existed despite the lack of a formal signed document and directed the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute, overturning the lower court's decision. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Validity of Arbitration Agreement - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 7 - The court held that despite the absence of a formal agreement, the tender documents containing an arbitration clause constituted a valid arbitration agreement as the tender was accepted and acted upon by both parties. The court directed that the matter be referred to an Arbitrator for resolution of the dispute (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitration agreement existed between the parties for the appointment of an Arbitrator.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the order of the Additional District Judge, held that an arbitration agreement existed, and directed the appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement existence
  • Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Tender documents as arbitration agreement
  • Acceptance of tender
  • Non-execution of formal agreement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (10) 22

Civil Appeal No. 6039 of 2008

2008-10-01

Tarun Chatterjee, Dalveer Bhandari

M/s. Unissi (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointment of an Arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the appointment of an Arbitrator.

Filing Reason

The PGI's refusal to acknowledge the arbitration agreement and non-payment for supplied goods.

Previous Decisions

The Additional District Judge dismissed the application for appointment of an Arbitrator.

Issues

Existence of arbitration agreement Validity of tender documents as arbitration agreement

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the tender documents constituted an arbitration agreement. The PGI contended that no formal agreement was executed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the tender documents containing an arbitration clause constituted a valid arbitration agreement, allowing for the appointment of an Arbitrator despite the absence of a formal signed contract.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that despite the absence of a formal agreement, the tender documents containing an arbitration clause constituted a valid arbitration agreement. The PGI admittedly had used the machines for about an year and thereafter returned the same to the appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a special leave petition against the order of the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, which dismissed the application for appointment of an Arbitrator on the grounds of no existing arbitration agreement.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 7, Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedin...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Direct Recruit in Indian Administrative Service — Clarifies Principles of Inter Se Seniority.