Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Criminal Case Following Settlement Between Parties. The court permitted the transfer of a criminal case from Bulandshahar to Delhi based on a compromise settlement reached by the parties, quashing all related FIRs.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a Transfer Petition under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by Bimla Agarwala and others seeking the transfer of a criminal case from Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh to Delhi. The criminal case was registered under FIR No. 637/2005 for the offense of cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. During the proceedings, the parties reached an out-of-court settlement, which was formalized in a joint petition for compromise dated November 30, 2008. The Supreme Court, considering the settlement, decided to dispose of the Transfer Petition by allowing the transfer of the criminal case to a competent court in Delhi. The court also directed that all related cases, including those concerning matrimonial and guardianship matters, be quashed and consigned to the records upon the parties moving the respective courts with a copy of the order. The court concluded that the parties should bear their own costs, thereby resolving the disputes amicably.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Criminal Cases - Transfer of FIR based on settlement - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 406 - The court allowed the transfer of a criminal case from Bulandshahar to Delhi following a compromise settlement between the parties, directing that all pending cases arising from matrimonial and guardianship proceedings be disposed of accordingly. Held that the transfer was justified due to the settlement reached by the parties (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of the criminal case and quashing of FIRs should be allowed based on the settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the Transfer Petition, transferring FIR No. 663 of 2005 to a competent court in Delhi and quashing all related cases based on the settlement between the parties. The court directed that the parties bear their own costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • Compromise settlement
  • Quashing of FIRs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (12) 114

Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 184 of 2007

2008-12-11

Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Bimla Agarwala and Ors.

State of U.P. and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer of criminal case

Remedy Sought

Transfer of FIR and quashing of related cases

Filing Reason

Settlement between the parties

Issues

Transfer of criminal case based on settlement Quashing of FIRs related to matrimonial and guardianship disputes

Submissions/Arguments

Parties reached a compromise settlement Request for transfer of case to Delhi

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of amicable settlements in resolving disputes and allowed the transfer of cases to facilitate this resolution.

Judgment Excerpts

We direct that the cases pending between the parties... shall be disposed of in view of the settlement between the parties. The Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 184 of 2007 is allowed as per the 'Terms of Settlement'.

Procedural History

The Transfer Petition was filed seeking the transfer of a criminal case from Bulandshahar to Delhi. The parties subsequently reached a settlement, leading to the disposal of the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 406
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Murder Conviction — Upholds Joint Liability. The court found that the appellant shared common intention with the main assailant in committing the murder, supported by eyewitness accounts and circumstantial evi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Revenue's Authority in Income Tax Assessments for Charitable Trusts. Court held that previous judgments apply to specific assessment years, and future assessments must consider the law declared based on individual facts.