Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Suit for Convenience. The court found that the petitioner's age and lack of income justified the transfer of her case to New Delhi under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by the wife, Rajni Kumari, under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to move her matrimonial suit from the Family Court at Khagaria, Bihar to a Family Court in New Delhi. The petitioner, aged 24, had no source of income and was fully dependent on her parents, making it challenging for her to attend court proceedings located approximately 1500 kilometers away. The court heard arguments from both parties and reviewed the materials on record. It recognized the difficulties faced by the petitioner due to her financial situation and the distance involved. Consequently, the court decided to transfer the case to New Delhi, directing the Family Court at Khagaria to send the case records within one month. The application for transfer was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Matrimonial Suit - Jurisdictional Convenience - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The court considered the petitioner's age, lack of income, and the significant distance to the current court location, determining that transferring the case would facilitate her participation in proceedings. Held that the case was to be transferred to New Delhi for the petitioner's convenience (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the matrimonial suit should be transferred from Khagaria, Bihar to New Delhi for the convenience of the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court ordered the transfer of Matrimonial Suit No. 5 of 2005 from the Family Court at Khagaria, Bihar to a competent Family Court at New Delhi, directing the transmission of case records within one month.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • Matrimonial disputes
  • Jurisdictional convenience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (12) 77

Transfer Petition (C) 551 of 2007

2008-12-12

Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Rajni Kumari

Raghvinder Sahay @ Lal Babu

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for matrimonial suit

Remedy Sought

Transfer of case to New Delhi

Filing Reason

Petitioner unable to attend court in Khagaria due to distance and financial constraints

Issues

Transfer of matrimonial suit for convenience Jurisdictional challenges faced by the petitioner

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for transfer due to financial and logistical difficulties Respondent's arguments not detailed

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that the petitioner could effectively participate in legal proceedings, considering her age, financial dependency, and the impracticality of traveling long distances for court appearances.

Judgment Excerpts

The distance from Khagaria to Delhi is about 1500 kms It would be difficult for her to attend the Court proceedings at Khagaria, Bihar

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a transfer application under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to move her matrimonial suit from Khagaria to New Delhi.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
  • Supreme Court Rules: Order XXXVI-B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Addressed Appeal and Writ Petition by Elevator Company Challenging Procurement Eligibility Clause in JICA Loan Agreement — Controversy Centered on Constitutionality of Nationality Restriction Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of Constit...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Converts Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Review Petition Due to Mitigating Circumstances. The Court found that the absence of prior criminal antecedents and positive conduct during incarceration warranted a reconsideration of the...