Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Rent Dispute — Provisional Rent Set at Rs. 3000. The High Court's provisional rent order was upheld, allowing the trial court to make a final determination.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute regarding the rate of rent for a shop room occupied by a tenant for over 20 years, who was paying Rs. 250 per month. The landlord sought eviction and arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 1,08,000, proposing a new rent of Rs. 3000 per month during the litigation. The Additional District Judge determined the rent at Rs. 250 per month and calculated arrears at Rs. 14,963.90. The tenant appealed to the High Court, which allowed the appeal in part, remanding the case for a fresh determination of the rent while ordering the tenant to pay Rs. 3000 per month provisionally. The tenant then appealed to the Supreme Court, which found no grounds for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. The Court upheld the High Court's provisional rent order, emphasizing that it was not binding on the trial court's final decision regarding the rent rate. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Rent Law - Rate of Rent - Determination of Rent - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The High Court remanded the case to the trial court to determine the rate of rent while directing the tenant to pay a provisional rent of Rs. 3000 per month. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's direction, clarifying that the provisional rate should not influence the trial court's final determination (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

What is the appropriate rate of rent for the shop room occupied by the tenant?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the tenant's appeal, upholding the High Court's order for provisional rent of Rs. 3000 per month until the trial court's final determination.

Law Points

  • Eviction
  • Rent Determination
  • Provisional Rent
  • Jurisdiction of Trial Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (12) 54

Civil Appeal No. 7192 of 2008

2008-12-08

Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Jarnail Singh

Ramesh Kumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the rate of rent and eviction of a tenant.

Remedy Sought

The landlord sought eviction and arrears of rent.

Filing Reason

The tenant was paying a lower rent than claimed by the landlord.

Previous Decisions

The Additional District Judge determined the rent at Rs. 250 per month.

Issues

Determination of appropriate rent Provisional rent during litigation

Submissions/Arguments

The tenant argued for maintaining the rent at Rs. 250. The landlord sought a higher rent of Rs. 3000.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's provisional rent order was justified, allowing the trial court to make a final determination based on evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that was raised before the High Court was that what was the rate of rent in respect of the shop room. The High Court had allowed the appeal of the respondent in part.

Procedural History

The tenant filed a suit for eviction and arrears of rent, which was decided by the Additional District Judge. The tenant appealed to the High Court, which remanded the case back to the trial court while setting a provisional rent.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 mandates that such petitions be heard by a Division Bench.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Authority in Compulsory Retirement Case — Validity of Procedures Affirmed.