Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition as Infructuous Due to Dismissal of Application. Transfer Petition Found Infructuous Following Dismissal of Application Under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by Gyanmati Yadav seeking the transfer of HMA Case No. 700/2007 from the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi. The Supreme Court had previously stayed proceedings in the trial court and issued notice to the respondent, Ram Sagar Yadav. However, it was later brought to the court's attention that the case had been finally disposed of on 18.8.2008, and an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure was pending. On 10.7.2009, the court learned that the application under Order IX Rule 13 was dismissed in default on 18.5.2009 due to the absence of parties. The petitioner's counsel could not confirm if a restoration petition had been filed. Consequently, the court deemed the transfer petition infructuous and disposed of it, allowing the petitioner to seek transfer again if the application under Order IX Rule 13 was restored and the ex-parte decree set aside. The judgment was delivered on September 11, 2009.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Dismissal of Transfer Petition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order IX Rule 13 - The transfer petition was deemed infructuous due to the dismissal of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in default. The court noted that if the application is restored and the ex-parte decree is set aside, the petitioner may seek transfer again. Held that the petition is disposed of as infructuous (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer petition should be allowed in light of the dismissal of the application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the transfer petition as infructuous due to the dismissal of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in default. The court allowed for the possibility of seeking transfer again if the application was restored and the ex-parte decree set aside.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • Infructuous petitions
  • Order IX Rule 13 CPC
  • Ex-parte decree
  • Restoration of applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (09) 110

Transfer Petition [Civil] No. 934 of 2008

2009-09-11

B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi

Gyanmati Yadav

Ram Sagar Yadav

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for a family law case.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of HMA Case No. 700/2007.

Filing Reason

Pending proceedings in the trial court.

Previous Decisions

Application under Order IX Rule 13 was dismissed in default.

Issues

Whether the transfer petition should be allowed in light of the dismissal of the application under Order IX Rule 13.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought transfer of the case. Counsel could not confirm if a restoration petition was filed.

Ratio Decidendi

The transfer petition was rendered infructuous due to the dismissal of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, highlighting the importance of active participation in proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The transfer petition will be deemed to have become infructuous and the same is, accordingly, disposed of. In case the application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is restored and ex-parte decree is set aside, it would be open to the petitioner to move this Court afresh for transfer of the main case.

Procedural History

The transfer petition was filed, notice was issued, proceedings were stayed, and the case was later found to be disposed of with an application pending which was subsequently dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order IX Rule 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Infant Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for drowning of 2-month-old daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasona...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996