Supreme Court Addresses Mining Operations in Aravalli Hills — Emphasizes Rehabilitation and Environmental Compliance. Court mandated strict adherence to rehabilitation plans and statutory clearances before allowing mining activities.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved extensive mining activities in the Aravalli Hill Range, particularly in the Gurgaon and Mewat areas, which had led to significant environmental degradation. Approximately 1500 hectares of land were allocated for mining, primarily for major minerals, but the actual extraction involved mostly minor minerals, resulting in severe damage to the landscape. The Central Empowered Committee (C.E.C.) reported the devastation caused by mining, prompting the Supreme Court to suspend all mining operations in May 2009. The State of Haryana argued that a complete ban on mining would hinder construction and development, proposing to allocate 600 hectares in Faridabad for minor mineral extraction. However, the court found it unfeasible to allow mining based on previous licenses due to the lack of reclamation efforts by operators. The court directed that any future mining in Faridabad must follow strict guidelines, including the establishment of an Aravali Rehabilitation Fund and a Monitoring Committee. The State was tasked with preparing a Reclamation and Rehabilitation Plan, which must be approved by the court before any mining could commence. The C.E.C. was instructed to submit quarterly reports on mining activities and rehabilitation progress. The court also mandated that all statutory clearances, including environmental approvals, be obtained prior to any mining operations. The decision underscored the importance of environmental compliance and the responsibility of leaseholders for rehabilitation. The court disposed of all related applications and set a future date for construction matters.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Mining Operations - Conditions for Mining in Degraded Areas - Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, Rule 27 - Court emphasized the need for rehabilitation and reclamation of areas degraded by mining activities before allowing further operations. The State must adhere to guidelines and establish a monitoring committee to oversee compliance. Held that mining operations should only commence after approval of rehabilitation plans (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to allow mining operations in the Aravalli Hills and the conditions for such operations considering past damages and rehabilitation needs.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court decided to allow mining operations in a designated area of 600 hectares in Faridabad only after the State prepares and submits a rehabilitation and reclamation plan, which must be approved by the court. The court mandated strict compliance with environmental regulations and the establishment of a monitoring committee to oversee the process.

Law Points

  • Environmental protection
  • mining regulations
  • rehabilitation obligations
  • statutory clearances
  • mineral concession rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (10) 57

2009-10-08

K.G. Balakrishnan, S.H. Kapadia, Aftab Alam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Environmental litigation concerning mining activities and their impact on the Aravalli Hills.

Remedy Sought

State of Haryana sought permission to allow mining operations in designated areas.

Filing Reason

Concerns over environmental degradation and lack of rehabilitation from past mining activities.

Previous Decisions

All mining operations were suspended by the court in May 2009.

Issues

Whether to allow mining operations in the Aravalli Hills Conditions for mining considering past environmental damage

Submissions/Arguments

State of Haryana argued for limited mining to prevent scarcity of building materials C.E.C. emphasized the need for rehabilitation before any further mining activities

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of environmental protection and rehabilitation in mining operations, asserting that mining should not proceed without adequate measures to restore degraded land and ensure compliance with statutory requirements.

Judgment Excerpts

The Aravalli Hill Range has been subjected to widespread mining activities in recent times. All mining operations in these hills were suspended by this Court vide order dated 8th May, 2009. The State shall issue a Notification laying down the guidelines and the procedure for giving licence/lease.

Procedural History

The court heard both sides regarding the mining operations and their environmental impact, leading to the suspension of mining activities and the establishment of guidelines for future operations.

Acts & Sections

  • Mineral Concession Rules, 1960: Rule 27
  • Forest Conservation Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Family Case to Jaipur Due to Convenience for Petitioner. Transfer justified as petitioner sought maintenance and lived with her parents, necessitating the case's relocation under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Pr...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales....