Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Criminal Appeal Due to Compromise Between Parties. The court recognized the validity of the compromise under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, leading to the acquittal of the appellants.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a criminal appeal where the appellants, Kartar Singh and others, sought relief from the Supreme Court after being charged with offences that were compoundable. An affidavit was filed by the wife of one of the appellants and the complainant, stating that the parties had reached a compromise regarding the charges. The court noted that all offences were compoundable under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Consequently, the court directed that the offences be compounded and acquitted the appellants based on this compromise. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, reflecting the court's endorsement of the parties' resolution of their dispute. The judgment was delivered on October 6, 2009.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Compounding of Offences - Acquittal Based on Compromise - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 320 - The court accepted the affidavit indicating that the parties had compromised the matter, leading to the direction for compounding the offences. The appellants were acquitted as a result of the compromise, demonstrating the court's recognition of the parties' resolution of the dispute (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the offences charged against the appellants can be compounded and result in acquittal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed that the offences be compounded under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and acquitted the appellants accordingly.

Law Points

  • Compounding of offences
  • Acquittal
  • Section 320 Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (10) 36

Criminal Appeal Nos. 1898-1899 of 2009

2009-10-06

Harjit Singh Bedi, R.M. Lodha

Kartar Singh & Ors.

State of Himachal Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal arising from charges against the appellants.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought acquittal based on a compromise.

Filing Reason

The parties reached a compromise regarding the charges.

Issues

Whether the offences charged can be compounded Effect of compromise on the charges

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued for acquittal based on the compromise. The complainant supported the compromise and requested the court to accept it.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that offences that are compoundable can be resolved through compromise, leading to acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

We issue a direction that they be compounded in terms of Section 320 of Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellants are, accordingly, acquitted in terms of the compromise.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from SLP(CRL.) Nos. 5843-5844 of 2008.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Matter; Enhanced Solatium and Interest Under Amendment Act 68 of 1984 Set Aside. High Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Amend Decree After Proceedings Concluded, Restoring Original ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Navneet Kaur in Caste Certificate Fraud Case — Upholds High Court's Quashing of Caste Validity Certificate. Caste Claim of 'Mochi-Scheduled Caste' Based on Forged Documents and Inconsistent with Presidential Order,...