Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition and Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent. Transfer of petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was granted as the parties reached a settlement and agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a transfer petition filed by the wife for transferring her husband's petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from Bahraich, UP to Delhi. The Supreme Court had previously stayed the proceedings and referred the matter to Lok Adalat, where the parties reached a settlement on 25.4.2009. The settlement included the withdrawal of proceedings against each other, acknowledgment of maintenance payment of Rs. 1,10,000, and an agreement to file for divorce by mutual consent under Article 13-B of the Act. The parties, married on 17.2.2001, had been living separately since 2003 and agreed that there was no chance of reconciliation. The court found the mutual consent for divorce to be free from coercion or undue influence. Consequently, the court allowed the application for divorce by mutual consent and disposed of the transfer petition without needing to pass a specific order regarding the transfer application. The judgment was delivered on 20.11.2009.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Petition - Transfer of proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The court allowed the transfer petition and noted the parties' agreement to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent. The parties had reached a settlement and agreed to withdraw their respective cases, leading to the dissolution of marriage. Held that the application for dissolution was appropriate given the circumstances (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 should be granted and if the marriage can be dissolved by mutual consent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the application for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent and disposed of the transfer petition accordingly.

Law Points

  • Transfer of petition
  • Divorce by mutual consent
  • Settlement agreement
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 9
  • Section 13-B
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (11) 48

Transfer Petition (C) No. 20 of 2005

2009-11-20

R. V. Raveendran, B. Sudershan Reddy

Sarita Singh & Ors.

Rajeshwar Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for divorce proceedings

Remedy Sought

Transfer of petition and divorce by mutual consent

Filing Reason

To transfer the husband's petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act

Previous Decisions

The court had previously directed notice and stayed further proceedings.

Issues

Transfer of petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner sought transfer of the petition to Delhi. The parties reached a settlement at Lok Adalat.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of mutual consent in divorce proceedings and recognized the settlement reached by the parties as valid and binding.

Judgment Excerpts

The parties agreed to file a petition under Article 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce by mutual consent. We, therefore, allow the IA No. 4 of 2009 under Section 13-B of the Act and the marriage between the parties is dissolved by granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

Procedural History

The transfer petition was filed in December 2004, the court directed notice and stayed proceedings on 24.1.2005, and the matter was referred to Lok Adalat where a settlement was reached on 25.4.2009.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 9, Section 13-B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Teacher Without Following Procedure Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983. Termination of Assistant Teacher by Trust without show cause or inquiry held illegal as Section 92 procedure...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Dismissal in Default Under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit for Partition. The bar under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC applies only when the earlier suit was dismissed in default and th...