Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Compassionate Appointment Due to Delay. Compassionate Employment Cannot Be Claimed After Significant Lapse of Time as It Aims to Address Immediate Financial Crises.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the rejection of a compassionate appointment application by M/s Eastern Coalfields Ltd. for Anil Badyakar, the son-in-law of a deceased employee, Kalo Dome. Kalo Dome passed away on December 31, 1981, and his family applied for compassionate employment shortly after his death. However, the appointment was made only in 1993, after a settlement among the heirs. The Director of the company later cancelled this appointment, citing the significant delay of 12 years as a reason. The respondent challenged this cancellation in the High Court, which ruled in his favor. The Supreme Court, however, overturned the High Court's decision, emphasizing that compassionate appointments are meant to alleviate immediate financial distress and cannot be claimed after a considerable delay. The court referenced several precedents to support its ruling, asserting that the purpose of such appointments is to provide timely relief to families in crisis, and that the lapse of time negated the need for such relief in this case. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, concluding that the employer's decision was justified and should not have been interfered with.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Compassionate Appointment - Timeliness of Application - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court held that compassionate employment cannot be claimed after a significant lapse of time, as it is intended to address immediate financial crises faced by the family of the deceased employee. The appointment in this case was made nearly 12 years after the death, which was deemed contrary to the purpose of compassionate appointments (Paras 3, 19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment made in respect of the respondent, who is the son-in-law of the deceased after 12 years, negates the very object of compassionate appointment

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court, and upheld the cancellation of the compassionate appointment due to the significant delay of 12 years.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • delay in application
  • financial crisis
  • vested rights
  • humanitarian consideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (05) 129

Civil Appeal No.3597 of 2009

2009-05-15

H.L. Dattu, Tarun Chatterjee

M/s Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Anil Badyakar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the cancellation of a compassionate appointment

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the compassionate appointment

Filing Reason

Cancellation of appointment after significant delay

Previous Decisions

High Court allowed the writ petition in favor of the respondent

Issues

Timeliness of compassionate appointment applications Nature and object of compassionate appointments

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the appointment was made too late to serve its purpose. The respondent contended that the appointment was valid as all heirs had consented.

Ratio Decidendi

Compassionate appointments are intended to provide immediate relief to families facing financial crises due to the sudden death of a breadwinner, and cannot be claimed after a significant lapse of time.

Judgment Excerpts

The compassionate employment cannot be claimed and offered after a lapse of time and after the crisis is over. The decision of the employer was in consonance with Umesh Kumar Nagpal’s case.

Procedural History

The appellant's appeal against the High Court's decision followed the cancellation of the compassionate appointment by the Director of the Company.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Deceased Homemaker. Notional Income of Rs. 5,000 per Month Upheld but Future Prospects and Enhanced Consortium Granted Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying declaration found inconsistent with medical evidence and lacking corroboration, failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under ...