Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Disability Rights Act for Land Allotment — Court mandates preferential treatment for disabled persons in land allotment.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the implementation of The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, specifically Section 43, which mandates preferential allotment of land for persons with disabilities. The petitioner, through Public Interest Litigation, alleged that many State Governments had not fully implemented this provision despite the Act coming into force on 7th February 1996. The Court noted that while some States admitted to partial implementation, others, like Arunachal Pradesh, acknowledged non-implementation. The Court found that the benefits provided under Section 43 were marginal and that no State had formulated specific schemes for the preferential allotment of land. Consequently, the Court directed that when allotting land for the purposes outlined in Section 43, State Governments and local authorities must give preferential treatment to disabled persons at concessional rates. The Court also emphasized that the percentage of reservation should be determined by the State Governments while considering the total percentage of disabled persons. Furthermore, the Court reiterated the need for appointing Chief Commissioners to address complaints regarding the deprivation of rights of persons with disabilities, allowing individuals to lodge complaints if benefits were not extended as per the Act. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Disability Rights - Implementation of Section 43 - Obligation of State Governments - The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, Section 43 - Court directed State Governments to ensure preferential allotment of land at concessional rates for persons with disabilities, highlighting inadequate implementation by various States. Held that preferential treatment must be given to disabled persons when allotting land for purposes specified in Section 43 (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether State Governments have implemented Section 43 of The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed State Governments to ensure preferential allotment of land for persons with disabilities at concessional rates, emphasizing the need for specific schemes and the appointment of Chief Commissioners to address complaints.

Law Points

  • Implementation of statutory provisions
  • preferential allotment of land
  • rights of persons with disabilities
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (03) 123

Writ Petition (C) No. 56 of 2004

2009-03-04

K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam, J.M. Panchal

Prajwala

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation regarding implementation of disability rights.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enforcement of Section 43 for preferential land allotment.

Filing Reason

Allegation of non-implementation of the Act by State Governments.

Issues

Implementation of Section 43 of the Act Preferential treatment for persons with disabilities

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for full implementation of Section 43. State Governments provided counter affidavits regarding their implementation status.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that State Governments are obligated to implement Section 43 of the Act, ensuring preferential treatment for persons with disabilities in land allotment.

Judgment Excerpts

The appropriate Government and local authorities shall be notification frame schemes in favour of persons with disabilities. No State has come forward with specific plea that schemes have been formulated.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation alleging non-implementation of Section 43 of the Act, leading to the issuance of notices to State Governments and subsequent counter affidavits.

Acts & Sections

  • The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995: Section 43, Section 62
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Municipal Lease Eviction Dispute; Holds No Contract Concluded and Tenant by Sufferance Not Entitled to Notice. Section 80 of Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act Required Corporation Sanction for Commissioner'...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Withdrawal of Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation — Upholds Need for NOC in Lease Agreements. The court found that the lessee's construction was illegal due to non-compliance with the Lease Deed's stipulations requiring ...