Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Records. The High Court's direction to approach civil court was set aside, and the competent authority was directed to consider the appellant's representation.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by R. K. Jangra against the High Court's order directing him to approach the civil court for correction of his date of birth in service records. The appellant joined as an Additional Design Engineer in 1980, providing a birth certificate indicating his date of birth as 4.1.1952. He later sought to change this to 3.1.1953, claiming an error due to his mother's illiteracy. Despite obtaining a corrected birth certificate in 1981, his requests for changes in service records were repeatedly rejected by various authorities, including the Registrar of Punjab University, due to time limits and procedural issues. The appellant filed a writ petition in the Punjab High Court, which dismissed the petition without addressing the merits, suggesting the appellant pursue civil court remedies. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, noted the appellant's prolonged struggle with bureaucratic processes and the urgency of his situation as he was nearing retirement. The Court directed the competent authority to consider the appellant's representation within a month, emphasizing the need for a fair evaluation of the documents submitted. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Correction of Service Records - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Punjab Civil Service Rules, 1994 - The High Court directed the appellant to approach the civil court for correction of his date of birth in service records without considering the merits of the case. The Supreme Court held that the competent authority must consider the appellant's representation regarding the correction of his date of birth based on the documents provided (Paras 5-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to correction of his date of birth in service records and the appropriate forum for such correction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed the competent authority to consider the appellant's representation regarding the correction of his date of birth within a month.

Law Points

  • Civil service rules
  • correction of records
  • representation
  • jurisdiction of civil court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (03) 62

Civil Appeal No. 1615 of 2009

2009-03-16

H.L. Dattu, Tarun Chatterjee

R. K. Jangra

State of Punjab and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against High Court's order regarding correction of date of birth in service records.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought correction of his date of birth in service records.

Filing Reason

Previous representations for correction were rejected by various authorities.

Previous Decisions

High Court directed the appellant to approach civil court without considering the merits.

Issues

Entitlement to correction of date of birth Appropriate forum for correction

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for consideration of his representation based on provided documents. Respondents maintained that the appellant should approach civil court.

Ratio Decidendi

The competent authority must evaluate the appellant's representation for correction of date of birth based on the documents submitted, emphasizing the need for a fair process.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court has observed: 'It will be just and appropriate to relegate the appellant to avail his ordinary remedy before a Civil Court.' We direct the competent authority/Principal Secretary, Department of Irrigation, Punjab, Chandigarh to consider the representation filed by the appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition before the Punjab High Court after multiple representations for correction of his date of birth were rejected. The High Court dismissed the petition, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Punjab Civil Service Rules:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Family Case to District Judge Due to Related Proceedings. Transfer Ordered to Ensure Judicial Efficiency and Consistency in Related Cases.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal...