Supreme Court Grants Mutual Consent Divorce in Transfer Petition — Settlement Reached Between Parties. Court Orders Decree for Dissolution of Marriage Under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Following Mutual Agreement.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed a transfer petition concerning the dissolution of marriage between the parties. The petitioner and respondent reached a settlement, which was documented in a Memorandum of Settlement filed with the court. Alongside this, they submitted an application for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The court noted that the respondent's counsel confirmed the transfer of all requisite documents, including a demand draft of Rs.3,00,000/- in favor of the petitioner, and acknowledged receipt of these documents. The court, exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, directed the dissolution of marriage in accordance with Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai was instructed to draw up a formal decree. The transfer petition was subsequently disposed of.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Dissolution of Marriage - Mutual Consent - Decree for dissolution of marriage granted under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The parties reached a settlement and filed a Memorandum of Settlement along with an application for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution to pass the decree as prayed by the parties. Held that the decree for dissolution of marriage was to be formalized by the Family Court (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent should be granted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court granted a decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, directing the Family Court to formalize the decree.

Law Points

  • Dissolution of marriage
  • Mutual consent
  • Article 142
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 13B
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (01) 207

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 823 of 2004

2009-01-12

S.B. Sinha, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma

Mr. Upadhyay, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain

Gurpreet Rohit Verma

Rohit Vedpal Verma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition for dissolution of marriage.

Remedy Sought

Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.

Filing Reason

Parties reached a settlement and sought court approval.

Issues

Validity of mutual consent for divorce Jurisdiction under Article 142

Submissions/Arguments

Parties submitted a Memorandum of Settlement Counsel confirmed transfer of documents and payment

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 142 to grant a decree for dissolution of marriage based on mutual consent, as the parties had reached a settlement.

Judgment Excerpts

A Memorandum of Settlement has been filed by the parties which is taken on record and accepted. We in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India direct that a decree for dissolution of marriage, by mutual consent, in terms of Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is passed.

Procedural History

The parties filed a transfer petition seeking dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, along with a Memorandum of Settlement.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13B
  • Constitution of India: Article 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unexplained Delay in FIR and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. The court held that the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act does not automatically bar bail if the prosecutio...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father Seeking Custody of Minor Daughter from Mother. Court holds that a mother cannot be said to be in illegal detention of her own child, and habeas corpus is not maintainable for custody dispu...