Supreme Court Disposes of Divorce and Criminal Proceedings by Mutual Consent. Parties Reached Settlement for Divorce and Disposal of Pending Cases.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute between Smt. Aparna Goyal and Rakesh Goyal regarding their marriage and associated claims. The parties appeared before the Supreme Court Lok Adalat on December 6, 2008, where they agreed to settle their disputes amicably. They sought a divorce by mutual consent and agreed that the husband would pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the wife as full and final settlement of her claims related to the marriage. The husband presented a draft for the agreed amount to the court's registry. The court disposed of the Special Leave Petitions and Transfer Petitions, directing that the amount be handed over to the wife. Additionally, the court disposed of the pending criminal and civil cases filed by the wife and the divorce petition filed by the husband. The court ordered that the divorce be granted in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, thereby dissolving the marriage. The judgment was delivered on January 27, 2009.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce by Mutual Consent - Agreement for Divorce - Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, Sections 13B(1), 13B(2) - Parties agreed to settle their disputes and sought divorce by mutual consent, leading to the dissolution of marriage as per the agreed terms. The court directed the disposal of pending criminal and civil cases in light of the mutual agreement. Held that the divorce was granted in accordance with the provisions of the Act (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the parties can settle their disputes and obtain a divorce by mutual consent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court disposed of the petitions, granting divorce by mutual consent and directing the disposal of pending criminal and civil cases as per the agreement between the parties.

Law Points

  • divorce by mutual consent
  • settlement of claims
  • disposal of pending cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (01) 136

Transfer Petition (C) No. 91 of 2008

2009-01-27

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, H.L. DATTU

Aparna Goyal

Rakesh Goyal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding divorce and associated claims between husband and wife.

Remedy Sought

The wife sought a divorce and settlement of claims.

Filing Reason

Pending criminal and civil disputes related to the marriage.

Issues

Validity of mutual consent divorce Disposal of pending criminal and civil cases

Submissions/Arguments

Parties agreed to settle their disputes and sought divorce by mutual consent. The husband agreed to pay a sum for full and final settlement of claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the principle of divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, allowing parties to settle their disputes amicably.

Judgment Excerpts

A sum of Rs.10 lacs which has been deposited with the Registry of this Court be handed over to Smt. Aparna Goyal, the wife. In view of the agreement, proceedings in Case No.259/2003 pending before learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, Patiala House Court and Case No.1011/1/2003 filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 stand disposed of.

Procedural History

Special Leave Petitions and Transfer Petitions were filed and taken up together for disposal.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1956: 13B(1), 13B(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by GSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Award of Rs.24,93,000 for Amputation of Leg. ST Bus Driver Held Solely Negligent; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist Established Under Section 166 of Motor Ve...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Modification of Arbitrator's Award on Interest Rate in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's discretion to award interest at 12% per annum upheld as reasonable under Section 29 of the ...