Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Due to Lack of Involvement in Offence. The court found that the appellants were not implicated in the offence as no chargesheet was filed against them.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Mrs. Monika and others against the State of Haryana. The appellants sought to challenge the proceedings related to an alleged offence. Upon review, the State of Haryana submitted a counter affidavit indicating that the appellants were not involved in the commission of the offence and that no chargesheet had been filed against them. The Supreme Court, upon considering this information, determined that there was no basis for the appeal as the appellants had not been implicated in any wrongdoing. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding that there was nothing left to adjudicate. The decision was rendered on January 6, 2009, by Justices Altamas Kabir and Cyriac Joseph.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appeal Dismissal - Lack of Involvement - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - The court found that the appellants were not involved in the commission of the offence and no chargesheet had been submitted against them. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as there was nothing remaining to consider. Held that the absence of charges against the appellants warranted dismissal of the appeal (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants were involved in the commission of the offence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the appellants were not involved in the commission of the offence and no chargesheet had been filed against them.

Law Points

  • Criminal procedure
  • Appeal dismissal
  • Lack of chargesheet
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (01) 19

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.6 OF 2009

2009-01-06

ALTAMAS KABIR, CYRIAC JOSEPH

MRS. MONIKA & ORS.

STATE OF HARYANA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal regarding involvement in an alleged offence

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the proceedings

Issues

Involvement of appellants in the offence Submission of chargesheet against appellants

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants were not involved in the offence No chargesheet submitted against appellants

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of a chargesheet and lack of involvement in the offence led to the dismissal of the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants were not involved in the commission of the offence, and no chargesheet has been submitted against them. Accordingly, nothing remains in the appeal and the same is disposed of having regard to the above.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from SLP(Crl.) No. 1676/2008.

Acts & Sections

  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Claim for Samman Pension under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme, 1972 rejected as petitioner failed to prove participation in Hyderabad Liberation Move...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MPID Act Case — Quashes Attachment Order for Lack of Nexus with Crime. Property of Hotel Avion Private Ltd cannot be attached under Section 3 of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 without d...