Supreme Court Dismisses Removal of Chairman of Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Due to Lack of Evidence. Allegations of Misbehaviour Found Baseless as Inquiry Revealed No Impropriety in Conduct.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed a reference from the President regarding the potential removal of Shri Ashok Darbari, Chairman of the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, based on allegations of misbehaviour. The inquiry was initiated following a request from the Governor of Chhattisgarh, which included specific allegations against Darbari. The court examined the evidence presented, including testimonies from 20 witnesses supporting the allegations and 3 witnesses in defense of Darbari. The court noted that the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission was established under Article 315 of the Constitution to ensure an independent recruitment process for civil servants. The court emphasized that the Chairman must exhibit integrity and impartiality, and any failure could constitute misbehaviour. However, upon reviewing the four specific charges against Darbari, the court found insufficient evidence to substantiate claims of irregularities in the examination process, misuse of government vehicles, improper claims for house rent allowance, and dictatorial conduct. The court concluded that the allegations were unfounded and that Darbari had not exhibited any improper behaviour. Consequently, the court ruled that he should continue in office and receive all due benefits. The reference was answered in the negative, affirming Darbari's position. The judgment was delivered on July 8, 2009, by Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justices Dalveer Bhandari and J.M. Panchal.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Removal of Public Service Commission Chairman - Grounds for Removal - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 317 - The inquiry into the conduct of the Chairman revealed no evidence of misbehaviour or irregularities in his actions. The court held that the allegations were baseless and did not meet the threshold for removal as prescribed under the Constitution. (Paras 1-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Shri Ashok Darbari, Chairman of the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, ought to be removed from office on grounds of misbehaviour.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court found no evidence of misbehaviour against Shri Ashok Darbari and ruled that he should continue in office, receiving all due benefits.

Law Points

  • Constitutional provisions
  • misbehaviour
  • inquiry process
  • evidence evaluation
  • public service commission
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (07) 92

Reference No. 1/2006

2009-07-08

K.G. Balakrishnan, Dalveer Bhandari, J.M. Panchal

Shri Amarendra Sharan, Shri S.K. Gambhir, Shri Vivek K. Tankha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Inquiry into the conduct of the Chairman of the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission.

Filing Reason

Allegations of misbehaviour against the Chairman.

Issues

Whether there was sufficient evidence of misbehaviour by the Chairman. Whether the allegations warranted removal from office.

Submissions/Arguments

The State presented evidence of misbehaviour. The Chairman's defense argued lack of evidence and baseless allegations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that without clear evidence of misbehaviour, the removal of the Chairman was unjustified, emphasizing the need for integrity and impartiality in public service roles.

Judgment Excerpts

The reference stands answered accordingly. We hold that Shri Ashok Darbari has not exhibited any improper behaviour.

Procedural History

The President referred the matter to the Supreme Court following allegations made by the Governor of Chhattisgarh. An inquiry was conducted with evidence presented by both the State and the Chairman.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 315, Article 316, Article 317, Article 145
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Cross-Writ Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Cooperative Society Managing Committee Under Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 on Ground of Failure to Hold Annual General Meetings. The Court Addressed t...