Supreme Court Modifies Interest Award in Arbitration Dispute — Clarifies Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the Arbitrator could not award interest for the pre-reference period due to an express bar in the contract but could award interest from the date of award to the date of payment.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a construction contract between the appellant and the State of U.P., with work completed in 1996 and subsequent claims leading to arbitration in 1997. The Arbitrator awarded a total of Rs.24,18,586/- along with varying interest rates on different components. The civil court upheld the award, but the High Court partially set it aside, ruling that the contract's clause G1.09 barred interest awards. The appellant challenged this decision, arguing that the Arbitrator had the authority to award interest despite the contractual prohibition. The Supreme Court analyzed the contract's language and relevant provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concluding that the Arbitrator could not award interest for the pre-reference period but could for the period post-award. The court affirmed the High Court's decision on pre-award interest but reinstated the Arbitrator's interest rates post-award, finding the High Court's reduction to 6% per annum unjustified. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the High Court's judgment accordingly.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Authority of Arbitrator - Award of Interest - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 31(7) - The court clarified that the Arbitrator could not award interest for the pre-reference period due to an express bar in the contract, but could award interest from the date of award to the date of payment as per the award terms. Held that the High Court's reduction of interest was not justified (Paras 18-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Arbitrator can award interest for pre-reference period and pendente lite when the contract prohibits the employer from entertaining any claim for interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, affirming the High Court's decision on the award of interest up to the date of the award but reinstating the Arbitrator's interest rates from the date of award to the date of payment as per the original award.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Interest
  • Pre-reference period
  • Pendente lite
  • Contractual prohibition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (07) 88

Civil Appeal No. 4197 of 2009

2009-07-09

R. V. Raveendran, P. Sathasivam

M/s. Sayeed Ahmed & Co.

State of U P & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the award of interest in an arbitration proceeding.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to reinstate the interest awarded by the Arbitrator.

Filing Reason

The High Court's partial setting aside of the Arbitrator's award.

Previous Decisions

The civil court upheld the Arbitrator's award, which was partially overturned by the High Court.

Issues

Authority of Arbitrator to award interest Interpretation of contractual clauses regarding interest

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the Arbitrator had the authority to award interest despite the contractual prohibition. The respondents contended that the contract explicitly barred any claim for interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The Arbitrator's authority to award interest is governed by the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and contractual prohibitions must be clearly defined to limit such authority.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue in this appeal is whether the Arbitrator can award interest for pre-reference period and pendente lite, when the contract prohibits the employer from entertaining any claim for interest. The bar against award of interest would operate not only during the pre-reference period that is up to 13.3.1997 but also during the pendente lite period that is from 14.3.1997 to 31.7.2001. The Arbitrator could not have awarded interest upto the date of the award, as the agreement between the parties barred payment of interest.

Procedural History

The disputes were referred to arbitration in 1997, the Arbitrator made an award in 2001, the civil court dismissed the application to set aside the award in 2005, and the High Court partially set aside the award in 2008.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 31(7)
  • Interest Act, 1978: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 16 for Deceased Aged 38 Years. Future Prospects and Conventional Heads Enhanced as Per Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi Guidelines.