Supreme Court Restores Bail in Defamation Case Due to Misapplication of Natural Justice Principles. Cancellation of Bail Held Improper as Complainant's Hearing Not Required in Bailable Offences Under Section 436 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the appellant against the cancellation of bail granted by the Judicial Magistrate in a defamation case. The appellant was accused of offences under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, with the complaint filed by the respondent after an interview given by the appellant. The bail was granted on December 1, 2006, but was later challenged by the respondent in the High Court, which cancelled the bail on March 24, 2008, citing violation of principles of natural justice as the complainant was not heard. The Supreme Court examined the provisions of Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which governs bail in bailable offences, and concluded that the right to bail in such cases is absolute and does not require the complainant to be heard. The court emphasized that the principles of natural justice do not apply in a manner that would lead to an empty formality. The Supreme Court ultimately restored the bail granted by the Judicial Magistrate, setting aside the High Court's order. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, reinstating the original bail order. The judgment was delivered on February 20, 2009.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail in Bailable Offences - Right to Bail - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 436 - An accused of a bailable offence is entitled to be released on bail pending trial, and the court is bound to release him if he is willing to abide by reasonable conditions. The High Court's cancellation of bail on the grounds that the complainant was not heard was held to be improper as it violated the established rights under Section 436. (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of bail granted to the appellant was justified on the grounds of violation of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the order dated March 24, 2008, passed by the High Court and restored the bail granted to the appellant by the Judicial Magistrate on December 1, 2006.

Law Points

  • Bailable offences
  • Bail rights
  • Principles of natural justice
  • Section 436 Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
  • Judicial discretion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (02) 388

Criminal Appeal No. of 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 4008 of 2008)

2009-02-20

J.M. Panchal, R.V. Raveendran

Rasiklal

Kishore s/o Khanchand Wadhwani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against cancellation of bail in a defamation case.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of bail granted by the Judicial Magistrate.

Filing Reason

Cancellation of bail by the High Court on grounds of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Bail granted by the Judicial Magistrate was cancelled by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of bail was justified Whether principles of natural justice were violated

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the bail was granted as a right under Section 436. The respondent contended that the complainant should have been heard before bail was granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to bail in bailable offences is absolute and does not require the complainant to be heard; cancellation of bail cannot be based solely on the absence of a hearing for the complainant.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Single Judge... cancelled the bail granted to the appellant... The right to claim bail granted by Section 436... is an absolute and indefeasible right.

Procedural History

The appellant was granted bail by the Judicial Magistrate on December 1, 2006. The respondent filed a revision application in the High Court on December 26, 2006. The High Court cancelled the bail on March 24, 2008, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 499, 500
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 436
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Personal Guarantor Against Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process Under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority correctly admitted the application under Section 95 of the IBC as the debt was due and defau...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in FERA Repeal Case — Appeal Against Post-Repeal Adjudication Order Lies Before Appellate Tribunal Under Section 19 of FEMA, Not Special Director (Appeals) Under Section 17 of FEMA. The Court held that t...