Supreme Court Upholds Prosecution's Reliance on Prior Evidence in TADA Case — Conditions Under Section 299 Cr.P.C. Must Be Met. CBI's appeal granted, emphasizing conditions for using prior evidence against absconding accused.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a decision of the Designated Court in Bombay regarding the use of evidence from a prior trial against Abu Salem Ansari, who was an absconding accused. The first respondent had been extradited to India after being arrested in a foreign country and was not present during the earlier trial. The prosecution sought to rely on the evidence recorded in that trial. The Designated Court ruled that the prosecution could use this evidence only if it could establish the conditions set out in Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Supreme Court, upon hearing the arguments, upheld this ruling, emphasizing that the prosecution must demonstrate the existence of conditions precedent as specified in Section 299(1) before relying on the earlier evidence. The court clarified that if the deponent from the previous trial is dead, incapable of giving evidence, or cannot be found, then the prosecution could rely on the earlier evidence. The appeal was disposed of with these clarifications.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Evidence in Absence of Accused - Conditions for Reliance on Prior Evidence - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 299 - The court clarified that reliance on evidence from an earlier trial against an absconding accused is permissible only if conditions under Section 299(1) are satisfied, necessitating fresh examination of witnesses unless certain exceptions apply. Held that the prosecution must establish the conditions precedent for using prior evidence (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution could rely on evidence recorded in an earlier trial against an absconding accused under Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the Designated Court's ruling, allowing the prosecution to rely on earlier evidence only if the conditions under Section 299(1) were satisfied.

Law Points

  • Reliance on prior evidence
  • absconding accused
  • conditions precedent
  • TADA Act
  • Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (02) 252

Criminal Appeal No. 328 of 2009

2009-02-06

K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam

A. Sharan, Amit Anand Tiwari, B. Krishna Prasad, Sushil Karanjkar, K.N. Rai

Central Bureau of Investigation

Abu Salem Ansari & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding the admissibility of evidence in a criminal trial.

Remedy Sought

CBI sought to rely on evidence from a prior trial against the absconding accused.

Filing Reason

Challenge to the Designated Court's order regarding the use of prior evidence.

Previous Decisions

The Designated Court allowed reliance on prior evidence subject to conditions under Section 299 Cr.P.C.

Issues

Admissibility of prior evidence against an absconding accused Conditions under Section 299 Cr.P.C.

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution argued for reliance on prior evidence due to the absence of the accused. Defense contended that fresh evidence must be examined as per Section 299.

Ratio Decidendi

The court established that reliance on evidence from a previous trial against an absconding accused is contingent upon meeting specific conditions outlined in Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

The prosecution may rely on the earlier evidence recorded in the earlier trial against the first respondent subject to establishment of existence of any of conditions precedent as described in second part of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 2.12.2008 passed by the Designated Court, Bombay in Trial No.BBC-1 B/1993.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 299
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Non-Explanation of Injuries on Accused. Citing the prosecution's failure to explain the injuries on the accused, the court found the defence's claim of private defence pl...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Revocation of Leave under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Bond Trustee Suit — Defendant No.3's Presence Not Necessary for Grant of Leave as Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai. The Court held that for grant ...