Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Order on Municipal Council Presidency. The court held that members elected from reserved wards are eligible to contest for the office of President when it falls in the general category.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against a High Court judgment that set aside the election of the appellant as President of the Municipal Council, Hisar. The election was held on 29.08.2006, where the appellant secured 19 votes against the respondent's 13 votes. The respondent challenged the election on the grounds that the office of the President was reserved for general category candidates, and thus the appellant, elected from a Backward Class reserved ward, was ineligible. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, but the Division Bench of the High Court quashed the election. The Supreme Court analyzed the constitutional provisions regarding reservations in local bodies, particularly Article 243T, which mandates reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and women but does not reserve seats for the general category. The court emphasized that the term 'general category' refers to unreserved seats available to all qualified candidates, regardless of their ward's reservation status. The court concluded that the High Court erred in its judgment, allowing the appeal and reinstating the appellant's election as President.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Elections - Eligibility of Candidates - Article 243T of the Constitution of India - The court held that members elected from reserved wards are eligible to contest for the office of President when it falls in the general category, as the reservation does not limit their participation in elections for unreserved posts (Paras 32-34).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 and the Rules framed thereunder curtail the right of Municipal Councilors elected from reserved wards to contest election for the office of President Municipality if the office is notified to be filled by members belonging to the general category?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, reinstating the appellant's election as President of the Municipal Council, Hisar, and set aside the High Court's judgment.

Law Points

  • Reservation in elections
  • eligibility criteria for candidates
  • interpretation of constitutional provisions
  • municipal governance
  • election laws
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (02) 227

Civil Appeal No. 976 of 2009

2009-02-13

B. Sudershan Reddy, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, P.S. Patwalia

Bihari Lal Rada

Anil Jain (Tinu) & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's decision to quash the election of the Municipal Council President.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to reinstate his election as President of the Municipal Council, Hisar.

Filing Reason

The respondent challenged the election on grounds of ineligibility based on reservation rules.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge upheld the election, but the Division Bench of the High Court set it aside.

Issues

Eligibility of candidates from reserved wards for general category posts Interpretation of reservation provisions in municipal elections

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that all elected members can contest for the President's office when it is not reserved. The respondent contended that only candidates from the general category can contest for the President's office.

Ratio Decidendi

Members elected from reserved wards are eligible to contest for the office of President when it falls in the general category, as the reservation does not limit their participation in elections for unreserved posts.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned judgment is, accordingly, set aside. The whole idea is to see that minimum number of seats as provided for is filled in by vulnerable sections of the Society.

Procedural History

The appellant was elected as President on 29.08.2006. The respondent challenged the election in a writ petition, which was dismissed by the Single Judge. The Division Bench of the High Court later quashed the election, leading to this appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Haryana Municipal Act, 1973: Section 10, Section 18
  • Constitution of India: Article 40, Article 243T
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.