Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions on Educational Grant-in-Aid Scheme Due to Discriminatory Practices. Exclusion of Institutions from Aid Scheme Found Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the exclusion of certain Junior High Schools from the grant-in-aid scheme after their upgrade to High Schools and Intermediate Colleges. The respondent institutions, recognized between 1983 and 1986, were not included in the grant-in-aid scheme due to a cut-off date of June 30, 1984. They filed a writ petition challenging the conditions imposed by the State Government that denied them aid despite their upgrade. The Allahabad High Court ruled in favor of the institutions, finding the conditions discriminatory and arbitrary, leading to the dismissal of the State's appeal. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, agreed with the High Court's findings, stating that the exclusion of the institutions from the grant-in-aid scheme was unjustified and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court directed the State to reconsider the institutions' applications for aid, ignoring the contested conditions. The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed, and the High Court's orders were upheld, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Discrimination - Violation of Article 14 - Constitution of India, Article 14 - The High Court held that the exclusion of certain Junior High Schools from the grant-in-aid scheme based on a cut-off date was arbitrary and violated the equality clause. The Supreme Court upheld this reasoning, emphasizing that the intention of the State Government to extend aid should not exclude institutions that continued to operate Junior High Schools despite their upgrade. Held that the exclusion was unjustified (Paras 19-21).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Junior High Schools, previously excluded from the grant-in-aid Scheme, are entitled to benefits after upgrading to High School and Intermediate College levels.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, upholding the High Court's orders. The petitioners were directed to reconsider the case of the respondent institutions for inclusion in the grant-in-aid scheme, ignoring the contested conditions.

Law Points

  • Constitutional validity
  • grant-in-aid scheme
  • educational institutions
  • discrimination
  • Article 14
  • recognition cut-off date
  • transitory provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (12) 6

Special Leave Petition(C) No.4630 of 2008

2009-12-02

Altamas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph

P.P. Rao, Dinesh Dwivedi

State of U.P. & Ors.

Committee of Management, Mata Tapeshwari Saraswati Vidya Mandir & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the exclusion of certain Junior High Schools from the grant-in-aid scheme.

Remedy Sought

The respondent institutions sought inclusion in the grant-in-aid scheme.

Filing Reason

The institutions were denied aid due to a cut-off date for recognition.

Previous Decisions

The High Court ruled in favor of the institutions, finding the exclusion arbitrary.

Issues

Whether the exclusion of certain Junior High Schools from the grant-in-aid scheme was discriminatory. Whether the conditions imposed by the State Government were arbitrary and violated Article 14.

Submissions/Arguments

The State argued that the cut-off date was necessary to manage financial implications and protect existing beneficiaries. The respondents contended that the exclusion was arbitrary and discriminatory, violating their rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The exclusion of educational institutions from the grant-in-aid scheme based on a cut-off date was arbitrary and violated the equality clause under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The expectations of the Respondent institutions were negated when by its Notification dated 7 th September, 2006, the Directorate of Basic Education, U.P. decided to bring 1000 unaided permanently recognized (A class) Junior High Schools on its grant-in-aid list. The High Court held that the exclusion of certain Junior High Schools from the grant-in-aid scheme based on a cut-off date was arbitrary and violated the equality clause. We are unable to accept Mr. P.P. Rao’s submissions that the said Notification was protected by the transitory provisions of Section 13-A inserted into the 1978 Act.

Procedural History

The respondent institutions filed Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.61343 of 2006, which was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court on 4 th January, 2007. The State's appeal in Special Appeal No.162 of 2007 was dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court. The Special Leave Petitions were filed against the High Court's judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Basic Education Act:
  • U.P. Recognized Junior High Schools (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act:
  • U.P. Intermediate Education Act:
  • U.P. High Schools and Intermediate College (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act:
  • U.P. Junior High Schools (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act: Section 13A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Sub-Inspector in Censure Penalty Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Censure Entry Set Aside as Imposed Without Show Cause Notice as Required Under Rule 14(2) of Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Inclusion in Seniority List and Age Relaxation for Village Panchayat Employee Seeking Promotion to Zilla Parishad Post. Petitioner's name omitted from seniority list due to crossing age limit of 45 years, bu...