Supreme Court Permits Appeal Against Dismissal of Government Servant — Upholds Right to Challenge Dismissal. The court recognized the appellant's right to appeal under the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1999, despite the delay in availing the remedy.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by a government servant who was dismissed from service following a departmental enquiry. The appellant, Khursheed Anwar Khan, was serving as an Arms Clerk and was dismissed effective from 20.09.2004. He initially challenged his dismissal through a Writ Petition in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which was dismissed on 10.03.2005 due to the availability of an alternative remedy of departmental appeal. Instead of pursuing the departmental appeal, the appellant filed a Special Appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, which was dismissed on 06.04.2006. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel sought permission to file an appeal in the department, but this request was denied by the Division Bench. The Supreme Court noted that under Rule 11 of the U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1999, the appellant had the right to file an appeal against the dismissal. Although the appellant did not avail himself of this remedy in a timely manner, the court recognized the importance of allowing the appellant to challenge the dismissal. The Supreme Court permitted the appellant to file an appeal to the Appellate Authority within four weeks and directed that the appeal be considered and disposed of on merits in accordance with law. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Dismissal from Service - Right to Appeal - U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1999, Rule 11 - The appellant was dismissed from service and sought to challenge the dismissal after not availing the departmental appeal remedy in time. The court permitted the appellant to file an appeal to the Appellate Authority, emphasizing the right to challenge the dismissal under the relevant rules, and directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on merits. Held that the appellant should be allowed to pursue the appeal (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant could challenge the dismissal order despite not availing the alternative remedy of departmental appeal in a timely manner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court permitted the appellant to file an appeal to the Appellate Authority within four weeks and directed that the appeal be considered and disposed of on merits in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Departmental enquiry
  • dismissal from service
  • alternative remedy
  • appeal process
  • U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules
  • 1999
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (08) 107

Civil Appeal No. 5271 of 2009

2009-08-10

P. Sathasivam, R. M. Lodha

Khursheed Anwar Khan

District Magistrate, Deoria & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to dismissal from service

Remedy Sought

Permission to file an appeal against dismissal

Filing Reason

Dismissal from service after departmental enquiry

Previous Decisions

Writ Petition dismissed due to availability of alternative remedy

Issues

Right to appeal against dismissal Timeliness of availing departmental appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought to challenge dismissal despite not filing departmental appeal in time Respondent argued against allowing the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the right of the appellant to challenge the dismissal under the relevant rules, emphasizing the importance of allowing an appeal despite the delay in availing the remedy.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is permitted to file an appeal to the Appellate Authority within a period of four weeks. The Appellate Authority is directed to consider and dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The appellant was dismissed from service on 20.09.2004, filed a Writ Petition which was dismissed on 10.03.2005, then filed a Special Appeal which was dismissed on 06.04.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Government Servant (Punishment and Appeal) Rules: Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Direct Recruits Over Special Appointees in Tamil Nadu Service Rules Dispute. The Court ruled that Direct recruits must rank above Special appointees and Compassionate appointees based on their mode of appointment.
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Order in Service Matter. Court Holds That Contempt Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated for Disobedience of a Lapsed Interim Order, as the Interim Order Merged wi...