Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Direction in Land Allotment Dispute Due to Lack of Objection. The Court directed the High Court to expedite the hearing of the writ petition without influence from prior orders.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against an interlocutory order issued by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, concerning land allotment. The appellants, Vice Chairman of the Lucknow Development Authority and others, challenged a direction that required them to provide land to the respondents, Mahant Baksh Singh and others. The Supreme Court noted that during the hearing, the respondents expressed no objection to the appeal being allowed, which indicated that the appellants' grievances were addressed. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's direction, and requested the High Court to expedite the hearing of the writ petition without being influenced by any previous observations. The judgment was delivered on August 4, 2009.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Interlocutory Orders - Setting Aside of Directions - Supreme Court of India, 2009 - The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's direction for land allotment as the respondents had no objection to the appeal being allowed, indicating that the grievance of the appellants was redressed. The court requested the High Court to expedite the hearing of the writ petition without being influenced by previous orders (Paras 4-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court's direction regarding land allotment should be upheld or set aside

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's direction regarding land allotment, requesting the High Court to expedite the hearing of the writ petition.

Law Points

  • Interlocutory order
  • Land allotment
  • Writ petition
  • Grievance redressal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (08) 29

Civil Appeal No. 5078 of 2009

2009-08-04

R.M. Lodha, Tarun Chatterjee

Mukul Rohtagi

Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority & Ors.

Mahant Baksh Singh @ Jai Chaudhary & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an interlocutory order regarding land allotment

Remedy Sought

Setting aside the High Court's direction for land allotment

Previous Decisions

High Court directed land allotment to the respondents

Issues

Validity of High Court's direction Grievance redressal of appellants

Submissions/Arguments

Respondents had no objection to the appeal being allowed

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the lack of objection from the respondents justified setting aside the High Court's direction, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution of the writ petition.

Judgment Excerpts

We, therefore, direct both the parties to appear before the Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority... In view thereof, we are satisfied that the grievance of the appellants stands redressed...

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an interlocutory order of the High Court dated March 31, 2009, which directed land allotment.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes of Criminal Appeal with Bail Order. Court grants bail to the petitioner based on a minor discrepancy in an audit report during his tenure as B.D.O. under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
Related Judgement
High Court Court Upholds Criminal Revision Applications Against Dismissal of Complaints for Evasion of Octroi Duty. The court found that the complaints were filed within the prescribed time limit and recognized the evasion of octroi duty as a continuing offence...