Supreme Court Directs Compliance with Nutritional Norms in ICDS Scheme — Ensures Implementation of Revised Guidelines for Malnutrition Reduction. The court mandated immediate action by States and Union Territories to comply with revised nutritional standards under the ICDS Scheme.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties against the Union of India concerning the implementation of nutritional norms under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme. The petition highlighted concerns regarding malnutrition and the need for revised feeding norms. The Union of India submitted an affidavit detailing actions taken to comply with previous court orders, including the universalization of Anganwadi Centres and revisions to nutritional standards. The court noted that the nutritional norms had remained unchanged since the scheme's inception in 1975 until a recent review by a Task Force. The revised norms included increased caloric and protein intake for children and pregnant women. The court directed immediate implementation of these norms by all States and Union Territories, with compliance reports due by January 15, 2010. The court also addressed non-compliance by certain states and reiterated the need for adherence to previous orders regarding nutritional provisions. The decision underscored the importance of addressing malnutrition through effective implementation of the revised guidelines.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Compliance with Court Orders - Implementation of Revised Nutritional Norms - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section Not mentioned - The court directed the Union of India and all States/Union Territories to implement revised nutritional norms for the Supplementary Nutrition Programme under the ICDS Scheme, emphasizing the need for compliance with the stipulated guidelines and financial allocations. Held that failure to comply would necessitate further action (Paras 6-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revised nutritional and feeding norms for the Supplementary Nutrition Programme under the ICDS Scheme have been adequately implemented by the Union of India and the respective States/Union Territories.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Union of India and all States/Union Territories to implement the revised nutritional norms for the Supplementary Nutrition Programme under the ICDS Scheme immediately, with compliance reports due by January 15, 2010.

Law Points

  • Nutritional standards
  • Supplementary Nutrition Programme
  • ICDS Scheme
  • Compliance directives
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (04) 149

Writ Petition (C) No. 196 of 2001

2009-04-22

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H. KAPADIA

Colin Gonsalves

People’s Union for Civil Liberties

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition concerning the implementation of nutritional norms under the ICDS Scheme.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought enforcement of revised nutritional standards for malnutrition reduction.

Filing Reason

Concerns regarding malnutrition and inadequate implementation of nutritional norms.

Previous Decisions

The court had previously issued directions regarding nutritional standards which were to be complied with.

Issues

Implementation of revised nutritional norms Compliance by States and Union Territories

Submissions/Arguments

The Union of India claimed substantial compliance with court orders. The appellant expressed reservations about the revised norms and the involvement of contractors.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with revised nutritional standards to combat malnutrition effectively, mandating immediate action by all relevant authorities.

Judgment Excerpts

It is directed that norms indicated in the said letter addressed to all the State Governments and Union Territories have to be implemented forthwith. Compliance reports filed by all the States and Union Territories by 15 th January, 2010.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2001, and the court heard submissions from both parties regarding compliance with previous orders and the implementation of revised nutritional norms.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Interim Orders on Legal Remembrancer Manual Amendments — Upholds State Authority's Competence. The High Court's direction to consider applications under repealed provisions was found to be legally unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of A...