Supreme Court Allows Extension for Reference Disposal in Housing Board Case. The court granted a fresh vakalatnama and extended the time for disposal of the Reference to ensure timely resolution of the matter.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved the State of West Bengal and the West Bengal Housing Board regarding procedural matters in a civil appeal. A minor controversy arose concerning the representation of the Housing Board by Mr. Bijan Ghosh, as Mr. H.K. Puri had previously been the advocate-on-record. To resolve this issue, the Supreme Court exercised its powers under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, allowing Mr. Ghosh to represent the Housing Board. The original Civil Appeal No. 1505 of 2003 had been disposed of on 6th November 2008, with specific directions for the Housing Board to file written statements and necessary documents within stipulated timeframes. The court had also directed the Reference Judge to dispose of the matter expeditiously. An application was made for an extension of time for the disposal of the Reference, which was set to expire on 6th May 2009. After hearing the counsel for the parties, the court granted an extension until 30th June 2009, allowing the Housing Board to examine relevant witnesses. The order aimed to facilitate the timely resolution of the matter while ensuring all parties had the opportunity to present their evidence. The court directed that a copy of the order be made available to the parties promptly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Representation by Advocate - Fresh Vakalatnama - Order 47, Rule 1 Supreme Court Rules - The court allowed a fresh vakalatnama to be filed by Mr. Bijan Ghosh on behalf of the West Bengal Housing Board to resolve a minor controversy regarding representation. The court exercised its powers to facilitate the representation and ensure the matter proceeded without further dispute (Paras 1-1).

B) Civil Procedure - Extension of Time - Disposal of Reference - Not mentioned - The court extended the time for the disposal of the Reference to 30th June, 2009, allowing the Housing Board to examine relevant witnesses. This extension was granted to ensure the matter was resolved expeditiously as previously directed (Paras 2-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to allow a fresh vakalatnama and extend the time for disposal of the Reference

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the fresh vakalatnama to be filed by Mr. Bijan Ghosh and extended the time for the disposal of the Reference to 30th June 2009, directing the Reference Judge to allow examination of relevant witnesses.

Law Points

  • Order 47
  • Rule 1 Supreme Court Rules
  • extension of time
  • representation by advocate-on-record
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (04) 98

Civil Appeal No.1505 of 2003

2009-04-27

Altamas Kabir, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma

Bijan Ghosh, H.K. Puri

State of West Bengal

Anil Naskar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal concerning procedural representation and time extension for disposal of Reference

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for disposal of Reference by the Housing Board

Filing Reason

To resolve a controversy regarding representation and ensure timely disposal of the matter

Previous Decisions

The original appeal was disposed of with directions for filing written statements and documents

Issues

Whether to allow a fresh vakalatnama Whether to extend the time for disposal of the Reference

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the Housing Board argued for the necessity of a fresh vakalatnama Counsel for the opposing party did not contest the extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of allowing proper representation and ensuring timely resolution of legal matters under its procedural rules.

Judgment Excerpts

We exercise our powers under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, and allow Mr. Bijan Ghosh to represent the Housing Board. We allow the same and extend the time for disposal of the Reference by 30th June, 2009.

Procedural History

The original Civil Appeal No.1505 of 2003 was disposed of on 6th November 2008 with directions for filing written statements and documents. An application was made for extension of time for disposal of the Reference, which was granted.

Acts & Sections

  • Supreme Court Rules: Order 47, Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Construction on Temple Tank Land — Upholds High Court's Decision. The court found that the tank was in a dilapidated condition and had lost its utility, justifying the construction of a shopping complex.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in POCSO Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Credibility Issues. The prosecution failed to establish the identity of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and significant delays in reporting the inci...