Bombay High Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail in Cheating Case Pending Sessions Court Decision. Applicant Directed to Return Amount and Attend Police Station Weekly.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 670
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant filed an application seeking interim protection from arrest in connection with FIR No. 114 of 2024 registered at Rabale Police Station, Navi Mumbai, under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had already filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC before the Additional Sessions Judge, Belapur, which was pending. The Sessions Court had rejected the applicant's interim relief application on 08/04/2024 and adjourned the matter to 29/05/2024 for arguments. The applicant approached the High Court for interim protection, arguing that he would be without protection until the Sessions Court decided his bail application. The FIR alleged that the applicant took Rs. 6 lakhs from the informant to provide two rooms but failed to do so, sold the premises to someone else, and returned only Rs. 1 lakh, leaving Rs. 5 lakh unpaid. The applicant contended that he had no intention to misappropriate and would return the amount due to financial constraints. The informant opposed the application. The High Court considered the submissions and found that since the Sessions Court had not yet passed a final order, the applicant was without protection. The court granted interim protection, directing that upon arrest, the applicant be released on bail on executing a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one or two sureties. The applicant was also directed to attend the police station every Sunday between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. until the Sessions Court decided his bail application. The informant was given liberty to file an intervention application before the Sessions Court. The application was disposed of with these observations.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Interim Protection - Section 438 CrPC - Applicant sought interim protection from arrest pending disposal of his anticipatory bail application before Sessions Court - Court held that since the Sessions Court had not yet decided the application and the applicant was without protection, interim protection was warranted - Directed release on bail of Rs.30,000 with sureties and weekly police attendance (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to interim protection from arrest under Section 438 CrPC while his anticipatory bail application is pending before the Sessions Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court granted interim protection from arrest, directing that upon arrest, the applicant be released on bail on executing a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with one or two sureties. The applicant must attend the police station every Sunday between 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. until the Sessions Court decides his anticipatory bail application. The informant is at liberty to file an intervention application before the Sessions Court. The application is disposed of.

Law Points

  • Interim anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Pending anticipatory bail application
  • Protection from arrest
  • Financial constraints
  • Return of amount
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (5) 21

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1204 OF 2024

2024-05-02

SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

Mr. Shubham Upadhyay a/w Fahad Qureshi, for the applicant. Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for the State/Respondent.

Parvez Babu Khan

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for interim protection from arrest in a criminal case under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Interim protection from arrest pending disposal of anticipatory bail application before Sessions Court.

Filing Reason

Applicant feared arrest in connection with FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Court rejected the applicant's interim relief application on 08/04/2024 and adjourned the main anticipatory bail application to 29/05/2024 for arguments.

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to interim protection from arrest under Section 438 CrPC while his anticipatory bail application is pending before the Sessions Court.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that he had no intention to misappropriate and would return the amount due to financial constraints. Prosecution opposed the application relying on FIR allegations.

Ratio Decidendi

When an anticipatory bail application is pending before the Sessions Court and the applicant is without protection due to a long adjournment, the High Court may grant interim protection under Section 438 CrPC to prevent arrest until the Sessions Court decides the application.

Judgment Excerpts

In this application the Applicant has prayed for the relief of interim protection from arrest in connection with C.R No. 114 of 2024, registered at Rabale Police Station, Navi Mumbai, on 07/03/2024, under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. I am inclined to protect the applicant till the said application is decided by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Belapur.

Procedural History

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC before the Additional Sessions Judge, Belapur (Criminal Bail Application No. 252 of 2024). The Sessions Court rejected the interim relief application on 08/04/2024 and adjourned the matter to 29/05/2024 for arguments. The applicant then approached the High Court for interim protection.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 420
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Examines Allegations of Police Brutality and Illegal Detention in Wake of Idgah Vandalism. Petitioners Claim Compensation and Quashing of FIR for Alleged Violation of Fundamental Rights During Investigation.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Minor Deceased in Motor Accident Claim — Minimum Wages Applied as Notional Income. The court held that the notional income of a 14-year-old deceased should be based on minimum wages, with 40% future p...