Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Development Scheme Dispute — Validates Scheme Post State Approval. The court affirmed that a scheme can be notified under Section 28 without prior approval from the State Government, as long as approval is obtained subsequently, validating previous actions.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from appeals against a judgment dated 3rd October 1985 concerning the validity of a development scheme initiated by the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad. The area was declared a development area on 20th August 1974, and the scheme was notified under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 on 8th, 15th, and 20th March 1980. The State Government approved the scheme on 11th June 1982, and it was subsequently notified under Section 32 on 28th August 1982. The Respondent challenged the scheme, arguing that it was null and void due to lack of prior approval from the State Government before its notification. The High Court agreed, leading to the appeals. The core legal issue was whether prior approval was necessary for the validity of the scheme. The Supreme Court referenced its previous decision in U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad & another vs. Friends Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and another, which established that prior approval was not a prerequisite for notification under Section 28. The court emphasized that the scheme's validity could be established post-approval, thus validating earlier actions. The court rejected the Respondent's argument that the scheme was invalid due to lack of prior approval, affirming that the legislative intent was to facilitate housing schemes. The court ultimately set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the appeals and stating that the Respondents could seek relief regarding land acquisition from the concerned authorities. The decision was made without costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Validity of Notifications - Requirement of Prior Approval - Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, Sections 28, 32 - The court held that a scheme can be notified under Section 28 without prior approval from the State Government, as long as approval is obtained subsequently, validating previous actions. The interpretation of the statute was found to support a liberal approach towards the initiation and approval of housing schemes (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a scheme notified under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 is valid without prior approval from the State Government.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the appeals and affirming that the scheme was valid as it was approved by the State Government after notification. The court directed that the Respondents could apply for relief regarding land acquisition to the concerned authorities.

Law Points

  • Approval of schemes
  • Notification under Section 28
  • Exemption categories
  • Interpretation of statutory provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2002 LawText (SC) (02) 137

Civil Appeal No. 1806 of 1986

2002-02-13

G.B. Pattanaik, S.N. Phukan, S.N. Variava

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad

Ram Krishna & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the High Court's judgment regarding the validity of a development scheme.

Remedy Sought

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad sought to validate the scheme and overturn the High Court's decision.

Filing Reason

The Respondent challenged the scheme's validity due to lack of prior approval from the State Government.

Previous Decisions

The High Court ruled in favor of the Respondent, declaring the scheme null and void.

Issues

Is prior approval from the State Government necessary for the validity of a scheme notified under Section 28? What is the interpretation of the statutory provisions regarding the initiation and approval of housing schemes?

Submissions/Arguments

The Respondent argued that the scheme was invalid as it was notified without prior approval from the State Government. The Appellant contended that the scheme could be validated post-approval, as established in previous case law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a scheme can be notified under Section 28 without prior approval from the State Government, as long as approval is obtained subsequently, validating previous actions.

Judgment Excerpts

The question for consideration is whether a scheme notified under Section 28 of the Adhiniyam is liable to be struck down if it has not been approved by the State Government prior to its publication. It is held that once the approval is given, all the previous acts done and actions taken get validated and the publications made under the Adhiniyam also become valid. The object of exempting more schemes is to permit more housing schemes.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the High Court's judgment dated 3rd October 1985, which declared the development scheme null and void due to lack of prior approval from the State Government.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965: Section 16, Section 28, Section 32
  • Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973: Section 3, Section 14, Section 59
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Admission of Medical Graduate in Post-Graduate Course Due to Unjust Denial of Application Form. The refusal to issue an application form was deemed unreasonable given the creation of a supernumerary Housepost specifically for the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Restoring Trial Court Orders on Complaint Maintainability and Deposition Authority. Complaint Filed Through Authorised Representative Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held ...