Case Note & Summary
The case involved appeals against a judgment by the High Court that dismissed criminal appeals filed by the appellants, who were convicted for the murder of Parshuram Bind and his father Sita Ram Bind. The incident occurred on June 3, 1989, when a group of assailants attacked the victims, resulting in their deaths. The prosecution alleged that the motive was rooted in political rivalry and previous enmity. The trial court convicted 11 individuals under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, while others were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149. The High Court upheld these convictions. The prosecution presented 10 witnesses, including eye witnesses P.Ws. 5 and 6, who identified several accused. However, P.Ws. 1 and 4 turned hostile. The Supreme Court analyzed the reliability of the evidence and the identification process, ultimately applying the two-witness theory due to the large number of accused involved. The court found that while P.Ws. 5 and 6 were credible, the lack of identification of Accused Nos. 9, 10, and 12 by multiple witnesses warranted their acquittal. The appeals of the remaining appellants were dismissed, confirming their convictions and sentences.
Headnote
A) Criminal Law - Identification of Accused - Two-Witness Theory - Requirement of Reliable Witnesses - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 149 - The court upheld the necessity of corroborative evidence from at least two reliable witnesses for conviction in cases involving multiple accused. The evidence of P.Ws. 5 and 6 was deemed trustworthy, leading to the conviction of most accused, while the lack of identification by two witnesses resulted in the acquittal of Accused Nos. 9, 10, and 12. Held that the two-witness theory was prudently applied in this case (Paras 1-3).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the identification of the accused was sufficient to uphold the conviction under the Indian Penal Code.
Final Decision
The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of Accused Nos. 9, 10, and 12 due to insufficient identification by multiple witnesses. The appeals of the other appellants were dismissed, confirming their convictions and sentences.
Law Points
- Identification of accused
- Two-witness theory
- Reliability of evidence
- Criminal procedure
- Homicidal death


