Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prosecution for Dishonour of Cheque Due to Valid Presentation Period. The court affirmed that the six-month period for cheque presentation under Section 138 must be counted from the date on the cheque.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against the dismissal of a writ application by the Bombay High Court, which upheld an order of the Sessions Court refusing to interfere with a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order taking cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, Surendra Madhavrao Nighojkar, filed a complaint alleging that the appellant, Ashok Yeshwant Badave, had issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The cheque was presented for encashment after the expiry of six months from the date it was handed over but within six months from the date mentioned on the cheque. The appellant contended that no offence was made out under Section 138 as the cheque was presented after the six-month period from the date it was made over. The Supreme Court analyzed the legal implications of post-dated cheques and referenced previous judgments, concluding that the six-month period for presentation should be counted from the date on the cheque. The court held that the prosecution was valid as the cheque was presented within the required timeframe, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments - Dishonour of Cheque - Presentation Period - Six-month period for presentation of cheque under Section 138 - The period must be reckoned from the date mentioned on the cheque, not the date it was handed over. The court held that a post-dated cheque is deemed to be drawn on the date it bears, thus the prosecution under Section 138 was valid as the cheque was presented within six months from its date (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the six-month period for presentation of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be reckoned from the date mentioned on the cheque or the date it was made over by the drawer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the prosecution under Section 138 was valid as the cheque was presented within six months from the date mentioned on it.

Law Points

  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Section 138
  • post-dated cheque
  • six months presentation period
  • dishonour of cheque
  • legal enforceability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2001 LawText (SC) (03) 24

Appeal (crl.) 293 of 2001

2001-03-14

K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi, B.N. Agrawal

Ashok Yeshwant Badave

Surendra Madhavrao Nighojkar & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of writ application regarding prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to quash the prosecution for the offence under Section 138.

Filing Reason

The complainant alleged dishonour of a cheque issued by the appellant.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Court and the Bombay High Court had upheld the cognizance taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Issues

Whether the six-month period for presentation of a cheque under Section 138 should be reckoned from the date mentioned on the cheque or the date it was made over.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the cheque was presented after the six-month period from the date it was made over. The respondent contended that the cheque was presented within the six-month period from the date mentioned on the cheque.

Ratio Decidendi

The six-month period for presentation of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is to be reckoned from the date mentioned on the cheque, not the date it was handed over.

Judgment Excerpts

The period must be reckoned from the date mentioned on the cheque, not the date it was handed over. The cheque was presented within a period of six months from 20.1.1996.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ application which was dismissed by the Bombay High Court, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Section 138, Section 139, Section 140
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to establish ownership and possession over suit property; appe...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension H...