Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Matter — Remits for Fresh Hearing. The Supreme Court set aside the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and directed a fresh hearing of the appeals, emphasizing the need for timely resolution.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed appeals challenging the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT). The case involved the appellant, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore, against the respondents, M/s FAXWELL Printers, Bangalore. The court noted that the CEGAT had previously followed an order in the case of Srikumar Agencies, which was also under appeal. In a separate judgment, the Supreme Court set aside the CEGAT's order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, indicating that the decision in the Srikumar Agencies case would apply to the current facts. The court requested the CESTAT to expedite the hearing of the appeals, preferably concluding by the end of February 2009. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed, and the matter was directed to be heard afresh.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Remittance of Matter - Fresh Hearing Ordered - Customs Act, 1962 - The Supreme Court set aside the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for timely disposal of appeals. The court directed that the appeals be heard afresh by the appropriate bench of the Tribunal (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the order of CEGAT, and remitted the matter for fresh hearing, requesting timely disposal by the CESTAT.

Law Points

  • Remittance for fresh hearing
  • timely disposal of appeals
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (SC) (01) 305

Civil Appeal Nos. 333-334 of 2001

2008-11-27

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. SATHASIVAM, AFTAB ALAM

Commnr. of Central Excise, Bangalore

M/s FAXWELL Printers, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the CEGAT's order and remit the matter for fresh consideration.

Previous Decisions

The CEGAT had followed an earlier order in the case of Srikumar Agencies.

Issues

Whether the CEGAT's order should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the setting aside of the CEGAT's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of timely resolution of appeals and the necessity for a fresh hearing in light of the previous order.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeals are allowed. We request the CESTAT to dispose of the appeals as early as possible preferably by the end of February, 2009.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the judgment of CEGAT, which had followed a previous order in another case.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Contractor Not Heard Before Termination of Contract. The Court Held That Principles of Natural Justice Require a Hearing Before Cancelling a Contra...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Land. Reference Court's Award of Additional Compensation Upheld as Just and Proper Under Land Acquisition Act, 18...