Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Income Tax Matter — No Power to Revise Under Section 264. Circular Binding Nature Not Applicable.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. challenging the dismissal of its revision petition by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant, a government-owned company, had filed its return for the assessment year 1970-71, which led to an assessment order disallowing certain deductions. Following an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, both the appellant and the Revenue filed second appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant later withdrew its appeal to pursue a revision petition, which the Commissioner dismissed, citing lack of power due to the ongoing appeal. The appellant's writ petition was initially successful, directing the Commissioner to consider the revision. However, the Division Bench reversed this, relying on precedent that the Commissioner cannot revise orders subject to appeal. The court reiterated that the entire order merges in the Appellate Tribunal's decision, and thus, the revision petition was not maintainable. The court also noted that while circulars from the Central Board of Direct Taxes are binding, they cannot override Supreme Court or High Court decisions. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's ruling without costs.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Revision Powers - Commissioner’s Authority - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 264 - The court held that the Commissioner has no power to revise any order under Section 264 if the order has been made subject to an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal, irrespective of the relief claimed in the revision. This is because the order of the Appellate Tribunal merges the entire order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, and thus, the revision petition cannot be maintained (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax can entertain an assessee’s revision petition under Section 264 when the order is subject to an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the Commissioner had no power to revise the order under Section 264 due to the ongoing appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Law Points

  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Section 264
  • revision powers
  • circular binding nature
  • merger principle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2000 LawText (SC) (05) 10

2000-05-11

Y.K. Sabharwal, S.R. Babu

Dr. Gauri Shankar

M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-I, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax assessment and revision petition

Remedy Sought

M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. sought to have its revision petition entertained by the Commissioner.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner dismissed the revision petition citing lack of power due to an ongoing appeal.

Previous Decisions

The Division Bench upheld the Commissioner's dismissal based on precedent.

Issues

Whether the Commissioner can entertain a revision petition under Section 264 when the order is subject to an appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the circular issued by the Board is binding and should compel the Commissioner to examine the revision on merits. The Revenue contended that the Supreme Court's decision takes precedence over the circular, and the Commissioner acted correctly.

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner of Income Tax cannot revise orders under Section 264 if those orders are subject to an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, as the entire order merges in the Tribunal's decision.

Judgment Excerpts

The Commissioner has no power to revise any order under Section 264 if the order has been made subject to an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. What becomes final in such a proceeding is the order made by the Appellate Tribunal which is a superior forum than that of the Commissioner.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a return for the assessment year 1970-71, leading to an assessment order by the ITO. An appeal was filed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, followed by second appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellant withdrew its appeal to file a revision petition, which was dismissed by the Commissioner, leading to a writ petition and subsequent appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 264
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Challenges to Additional Fees Imposed by Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Rule 32 and Rule 81 Under Scrutiny for Alleged Unlawful Levy on Delayed Renewals and Transfers
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Und...