Supreme Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal with No Infirmity Found. Delay in Filing Condoned but Appeal Lacked Substantial Grounds for Reconsideration.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a criminal appeal arising from Diary No. 27958/2010. The appellant, Sripal Singh Pathariya, challenged an order, but the court found no infirmity in the impugned order. The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and ultimately dismissed it. The decision was rendered by Justices Harjit Singh Bedi and R.M. Lodha on September 28, 2010. The court's analysis indicated that the appeal did not present any substantial grounds for reconsideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without further commentary.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appeal Dismissal - No Infirmity Found - Supreme Court of India, 2010 - The court found no infirmity in the order impugned in the criminal appeal and dismissed the appeal. Held that the delay was condoned and the appeal was dismissed without any further observations (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order impugned in the criminal appeal had any infirmity.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal, finding no infirmity in the order impugned. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned.

Law Points

  • Criminal appeal dismissal
  • delay condonation
  • order impugned
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (09) 114

Criminal Appeal No. of 2010 (Arising out of Diary No. 27958/2010)

2010-09-28

Harjit Singh Bedi, R.M. Lodha

Sripal Singh Pathariya

The Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against an order.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the impugned order.

Issues

Infirmity in the impugned order

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the order was infirm. Respondent's arguments not mentioned.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the dismissal of the appeal based on the absence of any infirmity in the order impugned.

Judgment Excerpts

Delay condoned. We find no infirmity in the order impugned herein. The Criminal Appeal is dismissed.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the order impugned, and the delay was subsequently condoned.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of 400-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Due to Medical Grounds — Liberal Approach in Limitation Matters. The court held that medical ailment of the only conversant party constituted sufficient cause under Section 5 of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under...