Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Interest Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced. The court modified the interest awarded by the arbitrator from 18% to 9% per annum, citing the absence of a specific contract regarding the rate of interest.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an arbitration award made on 6.7.1991, where the arbitrator allowed certain claims of the respondent while disallowing others. The arbitrator granted interest at 18% per annum for specific periods. The Civil Court, in its judgment dated 19.2.2001, set aside parts of the award and modified the interest awarded, limiting it to claims 1 to 4 and 7. Both parties appealed the Civil Court's decision. The High Court, in its order dated 30.12.2009, dismissed the appellant's appeal while partially allowing the respondent's appeal, entitling the respondent to interest from the date of reference to the date of the award at 18% per annum. The Supreme Court, upon hearing the appeals, noted that the award was governed by the Arbitration Act, 1940, and referred to a precedent regarding interest rates. The court ultimately reduced the interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum while upholding the Civil Court's judgment as modified by the High Court in all other respects. The decision was delivered on 27.09.2010.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Interest Rate - Modification of Interest Award - Arbitration Act, 1940 - The court modified the interest awarded by the arbitrator from 18% to 9% per annum, citing the absence of a specific contract regarding the rate of interest. The court upheld the Civil Court's judgment as modified by the High Court in all other respects. Held that the interest should not normally exceed 9% per annum in such cases (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the interest awarded by the arbitrator should be upheld or modified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part, reducing the interest awarded from 18% to 9% per annum while upholding the Civil Court's judgment as modified by the High Court in all other respects.

Law Points

  • Arbitration
  • Interest Rate
  • Pendente Lite Interest
  • Modification of Award
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (09) 73

Civil Appeal Nos. 8317-8318 of 2010

2010-09-27

R.V. Raveendran, H.L. Gokhale

M. Vijaya Bhaskar

A.P. STATE TRADING CORPORATION LTD.

G.V. MALLA REDDY & CO.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the modification of an arbitration award and interest rate.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the High Court's order regarding interest.

Filing Reason

The appellant and respondent both challenged the Civil Court's decision.

Previous Decisions

The Civil Court set aside parts of the arbitrator's award and modified the interest awarded.

Issues

Modification of interest rate awarded by arbitrator Entitlement to interest from date of reference to date of award

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued against the High Court's decision on interest. The respondent sought to uphold the High Court's order granting interest at 18%.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of a specific contract regarding the rate of interest, the court held that pendente lite and future interest should not normally exceed 9% per annum.

Judgment Excerpts

The arbitrator made an award dated 6.7.1991 allowing claims 1 to 8, 11 and 12. The High Court, by impugned order dated 30.12.2009, dismissed the appeal and revision filed by the appellant.

Procedural History

The arbitrator issued an award on 6.7.1991, which was challenged in the Civil Court, leading to a judgment on 19.2.2001. Both parties appealed to the High Court, which issued its order on 30.12.2009, prompting the current appeals to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration Act, 1940:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Zamindari Status of Village Due to Permanent Under-Tenure. Village Held Under Permanent Under-Tenure is Excluded from Zamindari Classification Under the Madras Estates Land Act, 1908.
Related Judgement
High Court Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Electricity Board for Alleged Disobedience of Order. The Board's demand for augmentation charges was found to have a prima facie legal basis, thus no contempt was established.