Supreme Court Issues Rule in Writ Petitions Regarding Status of Expelled Members of Political Parties. Legislative Intent Excluded Expelled Members from Tenth Schedule Provisions, Requiring Re-examination of Judicial Precedent.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed two writ petitions concerning the status of expelled Members of Parliament, specifically focusing on the implications of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution. The petitioners, Amar Singh and Jaya Pradha, both former members of the Samajwadi Party, sought relief under Article 32 of the Constitution due to threats to their parliamentary status following their expulsion from the party. Amar Singh resigned from his party positions on January 6, 2010, and was expelled on February 2, 2010, while Jaya Pradha had a similar political background. The Court examined the precedent set in G. Viswanathan vs. Hon’ble Speaker Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, which interpreted the Tenth Schedule's provisions regarding expelled members. The Court noted that the legislative intent, as evidenced by parliamentary debates, was to exclude expelled members from being treated as still belonging to their political party. The Court expressed concern that the current interpretation could leave expelled members vulnerable to arbitrary actions by party leaders. The Court issued a Rule for further examination of the issues raised and requested a referral to a larger bench to clarify the status of expelled members and the applicability of the Tenth Schedule. The decision in G. Viswanathan's case was not to be applied to the petitioners pending this reference.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Status of Expelled Members - Interpretation of Tenth Schedule - Constitution of India, 1950, Tenth Schedule - The Court considered the status of Members expelled from their political parties and whether they should be deemed to continue as members under the Tenth Schedule. It was held that the legislative intent was not to include expelled members within the ambit of disqualification provisions, necessitating a re-examination of the precedent set in G. Viswanathan's case (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

What is the status of a Member expelled from the party that set him/her up as a candidate for election?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court issued a Rule in the writ petitions and requested a reference to a larger bench to clarify the status of expelled Members and the applicability of the Tenth Schedule, pending which the decision in G. Viswanathan's case shall not apply to the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Constitutional interpretation
  • Tenth Schedule
  • expulsion from political party
  • parliamentary debates
  • judicial precedent
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (11) 10

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 317 of 2010 and No. 343 of 2010

2010-11-15

Altamas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph

Harish N. Salve, K.K. Venugopal

Amar Singh, Jaya Pradha

Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions concerning the status of expelled Members of Parliament.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought clarification on their status as Members of Parliament.

Filing Reason

Imminent threat to their continuance as Members of Parliament.

Previous Decisions

The decision in G. Viswanathan's case regarding expelled members.

Issues

Status of expelled Members of Parliament Interpretation of the Tenth Schedule

Submissions/Arguments

Legislative intent excludes expelled members from Tenth Schedule provisions Current interpretation leaves expelled members vulnerable to party leaders' whims

Ratio Decidendi

The legislative intent was to exclude expelled members from the provisions of the Tenth Schedule, and the current interpretation requires re-examination to prevent arbitrary actions by party leaders.

Judgment Excerpts

The Court considered the status of Members expelled from their political parties. The legislative intent was not to include expelled members within the ambit of disqualification provisions.

Procedural History

Two writ petitions were filed concerning the status of expelled Members of Parliament, leading to the Court's examination of the Tenth Schedule and the precedent set in G. Viswanathan's case.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Tenth Schedule
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Landowners in Land Acquisition Appeal; Compensation Settled at Rs.45,000 per Acre with Interest. Court Holds Hypothetical Lay-Out Method Inapplicable for Lands Frozen for Open Sale and Directs Payment of Additional Amount Under S...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Seniority Dispute Among Forest Officers — Upholds Graduate Officers' Seniority. The court found that the government had erred in unsettling the established seniority of the officers based on their training d...