Case Note & Summary
The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court which dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant, a manufacturer of coated fabrics, seeking a refund of excess excise duty paid. The appellant claimed that certain post-manufacturing expenses, specifically the cost of secondary packing in hessian cloth, should be excluded from the assessable value of their goods. The Adjudicating Authority had previously rejected this claim, stating that the packing was standard practice and thus included in the value for excise duty. The appellant's refund claim was also deemed time-barred. The High Court affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's decision, leading to the current appeal. The Supreme Court examined whether the cost of secondary packing should be included in the assessable value. The court referenced previous judgments that distinguished between primary and secondary packing, concluding that the additional packing was not necessary for marketability at the factory gate and was instead for the convenience of transportation. Therefore, the court ruled that the cost of secondary packing could not be included in the assessable value for excise duty. The court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the High Court's order regarding the inclusion of secondary packing costs, while leaving the question of limitation unaddressed.
Headnote
A) Excise Duty - Valuation of Excisable Goods - Inclusion of Secondary Packing Cost - Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 4 - The court held that the cost of secondary packing in hessian cloth, which was not necessary for making the product marketable at the factory gate, could not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. The additional packing was deemed for the convenience of transportation rather than a requirement for sale (Paras 16-16).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the cost of secondary packing is to be included in the assessable value of the appellant’s goods?
Final Decision
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal partly, ruling that the cost of secondary packing in hessian cloth could not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes, while leaving the question of limitation unaddressed.
Law Points
- Excise duty
- refund claim
- assessable value
- secondary packing
- primary packing



