Case Note & Summary
Bombay High Court held – Advisory communication from Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) regarding modification of objects did not amount to cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in making observations on the merits after dismissing appeal as not maintainable – Revenue not justified in treating advisory as non-statutory for appeal while relying upon it to deny exemption.
Held – Advisory communication was not an order of cancellation – Appeal not maintainable – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction in examining merits of advisory communication after holding appeal as not maintainable – Revenue not justified in treating advisory as non-statutory to dismiss appeal while using it to deny exemption. (Para - 28, 29, 33, 34, 40, 46, 52)
Acts & Sections Discussed:Constitution Of India – Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 12A – Section 12AA(3) – Section 12AB – Section 11 – Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975
Subjects:Income Tax Exemption – Charitable Institution – Advisory Communication – Maintainability Of Appeal – Registration Cancellation – Statutory Order – Jurisdiction Of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Issues:a) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that advisory communication dated 28 December, 2009 – was not a statutory order – hence, no appeal was maintainable.b) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction by making observations on merits – after dismissing appeal on maintainability.c) Whether Revenue could take contradictory stands – treating advisory as non-statutory to dismiss appeal – but relying upon it to deny exemption.
Submissions/Arguments:Assessee – Board Of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI)– Held that advisory communication amounted to cancellation of registration.– Argued that Section 12AA(3) empowering cancellation – introduced only from 01 June, 2010 – hence, no authority to cancel registration earlier.
Revenue– Contended that communication was advisory – not an order of cancellation – hence, appeal under Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not maintainable.
Ratio:a) Advisory communication – not an order affecting rights or liabilities under Income Tax Act, 1961.b) If advisory is non-appealable – it cannot be used to deny exemption.c) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to examine advisory on merits – after dismissing appeal on maintainability.
Issue of Consideration: The Board of Control for Cricket in India Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax And Anr.
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues






