Constitution Of India – Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 12A – Advisory Communication – Maintainability Of Appeal – Jurisdiction Of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Bombay High Court held – Advisory communication from Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) regarding modification of objects did not amount to cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in making observations on the merits after dismissing appeal as not maintainable – Revenue not justified in treating advisory as non-statutory for appeal while relying upon it to deny exemption.

Held – Advisory communication was not an order of cancellation – Appeal not maintainable – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction in examining merits of advisory communication after holding appeal as not maintainable – Revenue not justified in treating advisory as non-statutory to dismiss appeal while using it to deny exemption. (Para - 28, 29, 33, 34, 40, 46, 52)

Acts & Sections Discussed:

Constitution Of India – Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 12A – Section 12AA(3) – Section 12AB – Section 11 – Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975

Subjects:

Income Tax Exemption – Charitable Institution – Advisory Communication – Maintainability Of Appeal – Registration Cancellation – Statutory Order – Jurisdiction Of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Issues:

a) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that advisory communication dated 28 December, 2009 – was not a statutory order – hence, no appeal was maintainable.b) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction by making observations on merits – after dismissing appeal on maintainability.c) Whether Revenue could take contradictory stands – treating advisory as non-statutory to dismiss appeal – but relying upon it to deny exemption.

Submissions/Arguments:

Assessee – Board Of Control For Cricket In India (BCCI)– Held that advisory communication amounted to cancellation of registration.– Argued that Section 12AA(3) empowering cancellation – introduced only from 01 June, 2010 – hence, no authority to cancel registration earlier.

Revenue– Contended that communication was advisory – not an order of cancellation – hence, appeal under Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not maintainable.

Ratio:

a) Advisory communication – not an order affecting rights or liabilities under Income Tax Act, 1961.b) If advisory is non-appealable – it cannot be used to deny exemption.c) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to examine advisory on merits – after dismissing appeal on maintainability.

Issue of Consideration: The Board of Control for Cricket in India Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax And Anr.

2025 LawText (BOM) (2) 184

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1041 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1898 OF 2012

2025-02-18

M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

Mr P J Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nitesh Joshi i/by Mr. Atul K Jasani, for the Appellant/Petitioner. Mr P C Chhotaray a/w Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent/ Revenue.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax And Anr.

Related Judgement
High Court Constitution Of India – Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 12A – Advisory Communication – Maintainability Of Appeal – Jurisdiction Of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Eligibility and Promotion in Public Service" Judicial clarification on deputation service and eligibility for promotion. Analyzing deputation service relevance for promotion under National Highway Authority of India Recruitment Regulations.