Supreme Court Dismisses Application in Civil Appeal Due to Lack of Merit. Application Found Unwarranted for Further Consideration in the Context of Civil Procedure.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application in the context of Civil Appeal Nos. 4809-4810 of 2007, concerning the G.M. Tanda Thermal Power Project as the appellant and Jai Prakash Srivastava & Anr. as the respondents. The Supreme Court of India, upon hearing the learned counsel for both parties, determined that there was no reason to entertain the application submitted. Consequently, the application was dismissed. The decision was rendered by Justices Harjit Singh Bedi and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad on December 13, 2010. The court's ruling emphasized the lack of merit in the application, leading to its dismissal without further deliberation.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Application Dismissal - No Reason to Entertain Application - Supreme Court of India, 2010 - The court found no reason to entertain the application presented in the civil appeal and dismissed it accordingly. Held that the application did not warrant further consideration (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to entertain the application in the civil appeal

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the application, finding no reason to entertain it.

Law Points

  • Civil procedure
  • application dismissal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (12) 82

Civil Appeal Nos. 4809-4810 of 2007

2010-12-13

Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

G.M. Tanda Thermal Power Project

Jai Prakash Srivastava & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding an application

Issues

Whether to entertain the application in the civil appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the appellant argued for the application to be entertained Counsel for the respondents contended against the application

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the application did not warrant further consideration, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Excerpts

We find no reason to entertain this application which is, accordingly, dismissed.

Procedural History

The application was presented in the context of Civil Appeal Nos. 4809-4810 of 2007.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Land Acquisition Officer to Decide Section 28A Application in Land Acquisition Case. Mandamus issued to decide pending application under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as first appeal against reference court awa...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.