Case Note & Summary
The dispute arose from a construction contract awarded to the appellant by the first respondent, the Railways, in 1995. Following allegations of breach, the appellant invoked arbitration, resulting in a non-speaking award in its favor in 1999. The High Court set aside this award in 2001, directing the tribunal to issue a reasoned award, which was subsequently issued in December 2001, awarding certain amounts but denying interest for the pre-reference and pendente lite periods. Both parties challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the High Court ultimately dismissing the appellant's appeal while allowing the Railways' appeal on certain claims. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal regarding the interest issues but upheld the High Court's decision on the other claims. The appellant contended that the contract did not bar the arbitrator from awarding interest, while the Railways argued that the contract explicitly prohibited such awards. The court analyzed the contract's Clause 16(2) and relevant provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, concluding that the express bar on interest in the contract was valid and binding, thus justifying the tribunal's refusal to award interest. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming the arbitral tribunal's decision and ordering each party to bear its own costs.
Headnote
A) Arbitration - Award of Interest - Jurisdiction of Arbitrator - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 31(7) - The court held that the arbitral tribunal was justified in refusing to award interest for the pre-reference and pendente lite periods due to the express bar in the contract. The contract's Clause 16(2) specifically prohibited the payment of interest, which the tribunal adhered to in its decision (Paras 5-12).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the contract contained an express bar regarding the award of interest and if the arbitral tribunal was justified in refusing interest for the pre-reference and pendente lite periods.
Final Decision
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the High Court's decision and the arbitral tribunal's refusal to award interest due to the express bar in the contract.
Law Points
- Arbitration
- Interest
- Contractual Provisions
- Jurisdiction of Arbitrator
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act
- 1996


