
Deposit Condition – The appellant was directed to deposit ₹600 crores in an escrow account by 12.02.2025; failure to do so would automatically vacate interim relief – Para 14
Public Offer Extension – The open offer, originally set to close on 07.02.2025, was extended until SEBI's final determination – Para 15
SEBI’s Determination – SEBI was required to decide on: a) The valid date of public announcement under Regulation 20(1) – Para 7 b) The applicability of exemption under Regulation 11 – Para 12 c) The validity of the competing offer and offer price revision – Para 9
Non-Precedential Nature – The order was specific to the present case and not to be treated as a precedent – Para 16
"SEBI would be more concerned about public investors and their rights and interests." – Para 10
"The application filed by the appellants is still pending consideration by SEBI and has not been disposed of." – Para 11
Public Offer – Competing Offer – SEBI Approval – Open Offer Announcement Date – Exemption Application – Offer Price Revision – Investor Protection – Escrow Deposit – Regulatory Interpretation – Market Control
Case Title: DIGVIJAY LAXHAMSINH GAEKWAD (DANNY GAEKWAD) VERSUS SAPNA GOVIND RAO & ORS.
Citation: 2025 LawText (SC) (2) 772
Case Number: CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (arising out of SLP(C) No. of 2025) (@ Diary No. 6576/2025) With CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (arising out of SLP(C) No.3726 of 2025)
Date of Decision: 2025-02-07