Supreme Court Directs Regulatory Commission to Determine Power Pricing in Energy Dispute — Appeals Disposed. The court emphasized the need for the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission to determine the price of power supplied during a period when the appellant's sugar plant was not operational.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals against a common order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court regarding a dispute over the pricing of power supplied by the appellant, M/s Sagar Sugars & Allied Products Ltd., to the respondent, The Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. The appellant entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the NEDCAP for setting up a power plant using bagasse and subsequently entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the respondent. The APERC permitted the appellant to supply power, but issues arose when the appellant's sugar plant was not operational, leading to unutilized power. The appellant challenged a directive from the Chief Engineer of the respondent to stop power evacuation, resulting in a series of legal proceedings. The High Court initially ruled in favor of the appellant, but the Division Bench later set aside this order, directing the parties to approach the appropriate forum for dispute resolution. The appellant argued for a specific tariff based on a previous Supreme Court judgment regarding non-conventional energy pricing, while the respondent contended that the appellant's plant was not classified as a co-generation plant during the disputed period. The Supreme Court ultimately directed the APERC to determine the appropriate price for the power supplied during the relevant period, emphasizing the regulatory body's role in tariff determination. The appeals were disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Power Purchase Agreement - Tariff Determination - Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998, Section Not mentioned - The court directed the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission to determine the price of power supplied by the appellant during the period when the sugar plant was not operational, emphasizing the regulatory body's expertise in tariff matters. Held that the determination of price should be based on relevant materials and factors (Paras 9-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the price of unutilized power supplied by the appellant during a specific period should be determined by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission to determine the price of power supplied by the appellant during the period from 13.01.2003 to 21.01.2004 and to make any necessary balance payments by the respondent to the appellant.

Law Points

  • Power Purchase Agreement
  • Regulatory Authority
  • Tariff Determination
  • Non-Conventional Energy
  • Electricity Supply
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (SC) (11) 15

Civil Appeal No. 5159 of 2005

2011-10-13

A. K. Patnaik, R.V. Raveendran

Dr. Rajeev Dhavan

M/s Sagar Sugars & Allied Products Ltd.

The Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over pricing of power supplied under a Power Purchase Agreement.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought determination of the price for unutilized power supplied during a specific period.

Filing Reason

Challenging the directive to stop power evacuation and seeking payment for power supplied.

Previous Decisions

The High Court initially ruled in favor of the appellant but later set aside the order, directing the parties to approach the appropriate forum.

Issues

Whether the price of unutilized power supplied during a specific period should be determined by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for a specific tariff based on a previous Supreme Court judgment regarding non-conventional energy pricing. The respondent contended that the appellant's plant was not classified as a co-generation plant during the disputed period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the regulatory authority's role in determining the price of power supplied by non-conventional energy projects, particularly when the operational status of the generating plant affects pricing.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute between the appellant and respondent No.1 before us is whether or not during the period 13.01.2003 to 21.01.2004, when the sugar plant of the appellant had not commenced production of sugar, the unutilized power supplied by the appellant to the respondent No.1 will have the same price as the price of power supplied by non-conventional energy projects in the State of Andhra Pradesh determined by the APERC. We, therefore, dispose of these appeals by directing that the APERC will consider all relevant materials and factors and finally determine the price of power supplied during the period 13.01.2003 to 21.01.2004 and thereafter.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition challenging a directive from the Chief Engineer of the respondent, leading to a series of legal proceedings culminating in appeals to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA Due to Invalidity of Subsequent Orders. The court held that a fresh detention order cannot be made after a previous order has been quashed by the High Court.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Despite Repeal of FERA. The court ruled that preventive detention can be justified for violations of foreign exchange regulations even after the repeal of FERA.