Supreme Court Directs Payment of Pension and Compensation Due to Delayed Payments. Court mandates timely pension payments and compensation for prolonged litigation affecting the respondent's health.

  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved the Regional Institute of Printing Technology, Kolkata, and respondent No.1, Arup Kumar Mookherjee, concerning unpaid pension dues. The appellant had previously paid Rs.10,56,410/- to the respondent for the period from April 1, 1974, to December 31, 1994, but failed to pay any pension from January 1, 2007, onwards. The respondent's counsel highlighted this issue, which was not disputed by the appellant's counsel, who agreed to make the necessary payments. The court directed the appellant to pay the outstanding pension amount within two weeks and to ensure regular monthly payments henceforth. Additionally, the court recognized the respondent's prolonged struggle in litigation for over 37 years and ordered a lump sum payment of Rs.5 lakhs to cover interest and costs, emphasizing the urgency due to the respondent's advanced cancer condition. The court also noted that the necessary formalities for pension disbursement would be completed within a week. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Pension Law - Payment of Pension - Obligation to Pay Pension - Employees' Pension Scheme - The court directed the appellant to pay the balance pension amount and ensure regular monthly payments to the respondent as per law, acknowledging the delay in payments over 37 years. Held that timely payment of dues is essential, especially considering the respondent's health condition (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is liable to pay the pension and compensation to the respondent for delayed payments.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the appellant to pay the outstanding pension amount within two weeks and to ensure regular monthly payments. Additionally, a lump sum of Rs.5 lakhs was ordered to be paid to the respondent for interest and costs due to the prolonged litigation and health concerns.

Law Points

  • Pension rights
  • Payment of dues
  • Compensation for delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (SC) (07) 112

Civil Appeal No. 5341 of 2011

2011-07-11

Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma

Regional Institute of Printing Technology, Kolkata

Arup Kumar Mookherjee & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over unpaid pension and compensation for delays.

Remedy Sought

Respondent sought payment of pension and compensation for delays.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of pension and prolonged litigation.

Issues

Liability for unpaid pension Compensation for delayed payments

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant agreed to pay the outstanding pension Respondent highlighted the urgency due to health issues

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of timely payment of pension dues and the obligation of the employer to fulfill these responsibilities, especially in light of the employee's health condition.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has already paid Rs.10,56,410/- to respondent No.1 towards the pay and allowances for the period 1.4.1974 to 31.12.1994. We direct the appellant to pay balance amount of pension within two weeks. We deem it appropriate to direct the appellant to pay a lump sum amount of Rs.5 lakhs to respondent No.1 towards payment of interest and costs.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from SLP(C) No.1312/2008 and was heard by the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' Pension Scheme:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State in Probation Termination Case Under U.P. Tehsildars Rules. Termination of probation under Rule 14 did not constitute punishment under Article 311 and no automatic confirmation occurred upon expiry of two-year probation per...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Information in Writing Renders Search and Seizure Invalid.