Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Power Supply Disconnection — No Evidence of Inspection Irregularities Found. The plaintiff failed to prove that the inspection was invalid or that it did not exceed the sanctioned load under the Electricity Act.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a suit filed by a Private Limited Company engaged in printing, against the disconnection of its power supply due to alleged excess load. The plaintiff claimed to have been operating under a sanctioned load of 100 KW but was found to have a connected load of 190 KW during an inspection conducted on June 14, 1991. The plaintiff contended that it had not been informed of the inspection and denied the findings, asserting that it was only engaged in printing activities. The defendant, however, maintained that the inspection was valid and that the plaintiff was liable for the excess load and associated charges. The trial court, first appellate court, and the High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, leading to the present appeal. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the evidence, found that the plaintiff had not adequately disproven the inspection findings and that the actions taken by the defendant were in accordance with the terms of supply. The court noted that the plaintiff's claims were vague and lacked substantiation, particularly regarding the alleged manufacturing of PVC pipes. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Sanctioned Load - Exceeding Permissible Load - Electricity Act, 2003, Section Not Mentioned - The plaintiff was found to have exceeded the sanctioned load for Small Industrial Power Consumers, leading to higher tariff charges. The court held that the plaintiff failed to provide evidence to counter the findings of the inspection conducted by the defendant, affirming the dismissal of the suit (Paras 12-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff exceeded the sanctioned load for Small Industrial Power Consumers and whether the inspection conducted was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the judgment and order of the High Court dated 18.08.2009, finding no merit in the plaintiff's claims.

Law Points

  • Electricity supply
  • inspection
  • load sanction
  • billing
  • injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (11) 26

Civil Appeal No. 8207 of 2012

2012-11-22

Ranjan Gogoi, P. Sathasivam

CS Vaidyanathan, K. Datta

Shree Om Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of suit regarding power supply disconnection.

Remedy Sought

The plaintiff sought a decree of perpetual injunction to restrain disconnection of power supply.

Filing Reason

The plaintiff filed the suit after receiving a bill for excess load and a disconnection notice.

Previous Decisions

The suit was dismissed by the trial court, affirmed by the first appellate court and the High Court.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff exceeded the sanctioned load for Small Industrial Power Consumers Whether the inspection conducted was valid

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that no inspection occurred as claimed and provided evidence to support its position. The respondent contended that the plaintiff's responses were vague and did not adequately address the inspection findings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity for the plaintiff to provide clear evidence to counter the findings of the inspection, which it failed to do, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff claims to be registered as a small scale industrial unit under the Directorate of Industries, Delhi Administration. The plaintiff was given an option to remove the excess load failing which it was made clear it will be charged at the higher rate of tariff.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a suit on 06.04.1992, which was dismissed by the trial court, affirmed by the first appellate court, and subsequently upheld by the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petition for Want of Prosecution Due to Absence of Representation. Court Emphasizes Importance of Presence in Legal Proceedings.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Co-operative Society Election. Court upholds election process conducted by Returning Officer under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.