Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Ruling on Appellate Tribunal Appointments — Rules Declared Ultra Vires. The introduction of part time Members in the Rules was found inconsistent with the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a challenge to the legality of certain appointments made under the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (Recruitment, Salary and Allowances and Other Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules, 2000. The appellants, Union of India and others, questioned the High Court's order declaring specific provisions of the Rules as ultra vires the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. The High Court found that the Rules improperly introduced the concept of part time Members, which was not provided for in the Act. The appellants contended that the appointments were valid as they were made by a High Level Committee and that the Rules were within the scope of the Act. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the provisions of the Act, particularly Sections 20 and 21, concluded that the Act did not allow for part time Members and that the High Court's ruling was justified. The Court emphasized that the qualifications for Members and the Chairperson were clearly defined in the Act, and any deviation through the Rules was impermissible. The Supreme Court also clarified that the judgments and orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal during the tenure of the invalidly appointed Members would not be rendered void, ensuring continuity and stability in the judicial process. The appeals were disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation - Ultra Vires Rule - Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Section 20 - The High Court declared the first and second provisos to Rule 5 of the Rules as ultra vires the Act, as they introduced the concept of part time Members which is not envisaged by the Act. The Supreme Court upheld this finding, emphasizing that the enabling provision does not allow for part time Members, thus validating the High Court's decision (Paras 5, 28).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of Rule 5 of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (Recruitment, Salary and Allowances and Other Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules, 2000 are ultra vires the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling declaring the first and second provisos to Rule 5 as ultra vires the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. The Court clarified that the judgments and orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal during the tenure of invalidly appointed Members would not be rendered void.

Law Points

  • Ultra vires
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Foreign Exchange Management Act
  • part time Members
  • eligibility criteria
  • judicial appointments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (05) 59

Civil Appeal No. 3185 of 2005

2012-05-21

Dipak Misra, B.S. Chauhan

R.P. Bhatt, Mahabir Singh

Union of India and others

S. Srinivasan, Saroj Kumar Shukla and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the legality of appointments made under the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange Rules.

Remedy Sought

Quashment of certain notifications and appointments made under the Rules.

Filing Reason

Allegation that the Rules were ultra vires the Foreign Exchange Management Act.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had declared certain provisions of the Rules as ultra vires.

Issues

Whether the provisions of Rule 5 are ultra vires the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Whether part time Members can be appointed under the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the appointments were valid and within the scope of the Act. The respondents contended that the introduction of part time Members was not permitted under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The introduction of part time Members in the Rules was found to be inconsistent with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, which does not envisage such appointments.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court declared the first and second proviso to Rule 5 of the Rules as ultra vires Section 21(1)(b) of the Act. The rule does not conform to the main enactment.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the common judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition Nos. 7606 of 2003 and others, challenging the legality of certain appointments made under the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange Rules.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999: Section 20, Section 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Section 55A Notice for Valuation After Assessment Completed — Assessing Officer Cannot Refer Valuation After Passing Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The power under Section 55A is to be exerc...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commission Order in Final Decree Proceedings Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with CPC Requirements. The court held that the trial court must first determine the mode of partition before issuing a commiss...