Acts and Sections Discussed:

1. Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
2. Principles of Natural Justice
3. Judicial Precedents on Alternate Remedy (Oberoi Constructions Ltd. case).

1. Introduction (Paras 1-2):

• Fact: The Petitioner, Zoomcar India Private Limited, challenged two orders dated 3 July 2024, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, claiming procedural and substantive violations.
• Court Observation: The Court noted the availability of an alternate statutory remedy (appeal).

2. Claim of Non-Efficacious Remedy (Para 3):

• Fact: The Petitioner acknowledged the existence of an appeal mechanism but argued it was not efficacious, citing natural justice violations and incorrect interpretations.

3. Arguments on Merits (Paras 4-5):

• Petitioner's Claim: Tax was wrongly demanded on items already taxed, and this issue was ignored by the Assistant Commissioner.
• Respondent’s Defense: Justified the orders and argued for reliance on the appellate mechanism.

4. Exhaustion of Remedies (Paras 6-7):

• Court's Ruling: Alleging natural justice violations without substantiation does not suffice to bypass alternate remedies.
• Precedents Cited: Recent decision in Oberoi Constructions Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

5. Factual Disputes Best Left to Appellate Authority (Para 8):

• Reasoning: Issues such as double taxation require factual inquiry, appropriate for appellate consideration.
• Observation: Rectification applications were not filed within the prescribed period, which could have addressed concerns earlier.

6. Liberty to Appeal (Paras 9-10):

• Decision: Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file an appeal within four weeks. Appeals will not be rejected on grounds of limitation as the petition was filed bona fide.

7. Rectification Application (Para 11):

• Observation: The Petitioner remains free to file a rectification application if maintainable under law.

8. Disposition (Para 12):

• Final Order: Petition disposed of; all contentions remain open for appellate adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi:

The Court reiterated the principle that a writ petition should not be entertained when a statutory remedy exists unless the remedy is demonstrably inadequate. Factual disputes, especially involving tax matters, are better resolved at the appellate level rather than under writ jurisdiction.

Subjects:

• Taxation Law
• Natural Justice
• Alternate Remedies
• Judicial Precedents
• Writ Jurisdiction