Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Due to Non-Compliance by Respondent. Valid Arbitration Clause Established with Breach of Contract Noted.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 25.5.2009 between the petitioner and the respondent for the supply of 12,500 MT of metal scraps at a total contract value of USD 3,000,000. The petitioner made payments totaling USD 1,000,000 but did not receive the materials as per the agreement. Following repeated requests for delivery, the petitioner sent a notice on 29.10.2009 seeking arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the agreement. The clause allowed for arbitration in either Spain or India, and the petitioner opted for arbitration in India. The non-applicant did not nominate an arbitrator despite being given the opportunity, and the court noted that the arbitration clause did not specify the number of arbitrators. The court concluded that there was a prima facie breach of the agreement by the non-applicant and that the arbitration petition was filed within the limitation period. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and appointed Mr. Justice B.P. Singh as the sole arbitrator, granting him the discretion to fix his remuneration and conduct the proceedings at a convenient location. The order was to be communicated to the arbitrator for prompt action.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Validity of Arbitration Clause - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(6) - The court found a valid subsisting arbitration clause and noted the non-applicant's failure to nominate an arbitrator despite notice. The petition was allowed, and the dispute was referred to a sole arbitrator, emphasizing the need for resolution under the agreed terms (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and appointed Mr. Justice B.P. Singh as the sole arbitrator, with the arbitration proceedings to be held in Delhi or a convenient location.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • appointment of arbitrator
  • breach of contract
  • arbitration clause
  • limitation period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (07) 58

Arbitration Petition No. 18 of 2011

2012-07-25

Surinder Singh Nijjar

M/S. Calcutta Industrial Corp.

M/S. Jaya Steel & Scrap LLC

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought the appointment of a sole arbitrator.

Filing Reason

Non-receipt of materials as per the agreement and failure of the respondent to nominate an arbitrator.

Issues

Validity of the arbitration clause Breach of contract by the respondent

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for the appointment of a sole arbitrator due to non-compliance by the respondent. Respondent did not appear or nominate an arbitrator despite notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the validity of the arbitration clause and the necessity of appointing an arbitrator when one party fails to comply with the agreement.

Judgment Excerpts

The parties had entered into an agreement dated 25.5.2009. The non-applicant seems to have prima facie acted in breach of the agreement. I hereby appoint Mr. Justice B.P. Singh, former Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator.

Procedural History

The application was filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitrator due to the respondent's failure to comply with the arbitration clause.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff in Mortgage Enforcement Suit Against High Court's Setting Aside of Decrees; Holds Appeal Against Mere Finding on Partition Not Maintainable. Amendment of Appeal Memorandum After Seven-and-a-Half-Year Delay Without Condo...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Valuation Based on Market Value Determines Forum. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Non-Agricultural Property Must Be Valued Under Section 6 of Bombay Court Fe...