Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Dispute — Jurisdiction of Civil Courts Affirmed. Citing Sections 91 and 163 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, the Court held that the suits challenging the resolution and conveyance were maintainable.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals arising from a common order of the Bombay High Court regarding the maintainability of two civil suits filed by tenant members of a housing cooperative society against the society's resolution to sell property. The society, incorporated in 1914, had 762 members, including 69 tenant members. The tenant members challenged a resolution passed on December 6, 2009, to sell land to third parties, claiming the resolution and subsequent conveyance were illegal. The High Court ruled the suits were not maintainable under Sections 91 and 163 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that the disputes should be resolved by the Co-operative Court. The appellants contended that the Civil Court had jurisdiction to declare the conveyance void as it involved a non-member. The Supreme Court analyzed the jurisdictional issues, emphasizing that the Civil Court's jurisdiction is not excluded unless explicitly stated in the statute. The Court concluded that the suits were maintainable, allowing the appellants to seek relief in the Civil Court. The Court directed the parties to maintain status quo for two weeks to enable the High Court to consider interim orders. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Societies Law - Jurisdiction of Civil Courts - Maintainability of Suits - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 91, 163 - The High Court held that the suits were not maintainable as the disputes were amenable to the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court under Section 91. The Supreme Court disagreed, stating that the Civil Court's jurisdiction is not excluded unless expressly stated, and the suits could challenge the conveyance and resolution independently. Held that the suits are maintainable (Paras 39-41).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suits filed by the appellants were maintainable in light of Sections 91 and 163 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court held that the suits were maintainable and that the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts was not excluded by the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The Court directed the parties to maintain status quo for two weeks to allow the High Court to consider interim orders.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Civil Courts
  • Maintainability of Suits
  • Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Sections 91
  • 163
  • 9 of CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (01) 67

Civil Appeal Nos. 1175-1177 of 2012

2012-01-30

J. Chelameswar, J. P. Sathasivam

Mukul Rohtagi, Dr. Abhishek M. Singhvi, C.A. Sundaram, K.K. Venugopal

Margret Almeida & Ors.

The Bombay Catholic Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the maintainability of civil suits challenging a resolution and conveyance by a housing cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought declarations that the resolution and conveyance were invalid.

Filing Reason

The suits were filed to challenge the legality of a resolution to sell property to non-members.

Previous Decisions

The Bombay High Court ruled the suits were not maintainable under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.

Issues

Whether the suits were maintainable under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Whether the jurisdiction of Civil Courts was excluded by the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the Civil Court had jurisdiction to declare the conveyance void. The respondents contended that the disputes were exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The jurisdiction of Civil Courts is not excluded unless expressly stated in the statute, and suits challenging resolutions and conveyances can be maintained in Civil Courts.

Judgment Excerpts

The suits are maintainable. The jurisdiction of the Civil Court's jurisdiction is not excluded unless expressly stated. The parties are directed to maintain status quo.

Procedural History

The appeals arose from a common order of the Bombay High Court regarding the maintainability of suits filed against a resolution and conveyance by a housing cooperative society.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Sections 91, 163
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 9, Section 9A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Reinstatement of Employee in Service Matter — Fairness in Promotion Conditions Affirmed. The court found that termination was improper as the appellant should have been reverted to his original position instead of being termin...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Murder Conviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.