Supreme Court Allows Railways to Construct Transmission Lines for Power Supply Due to Excessive Tariffs. Railways Act, 1989 empowers Railways to construct necessary transmission lines for their operations without needing UPSEB's permission.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerned the legality of Northern Railways' construction of transmission lines to draw power from NTPC, moving away from UPSEB's supply. UPSEB had previously supplied power to Railways, but due to excessive tariffs, Railways sought to enter into a power purchasing agreement with NTPC and construct their own lines. After obtaining cabinet approval in 1990 and entering into an agreement with NTPC in 1998, Railways began construction, prompting UPSEB to issue a notice threatening demolition of the lines. Railways challenged this notice in the Delhi High Court, which stayed the notice and allowed construction. Subsequently, UPSEB filed a petition against Railways' power draw from NTPC, leading to the transfer of both cases to the Supreme Court to avoid conflicting decisions. The court analyzed the authority of Railways under the Railways Act, 1989, and the Electricity Act, 1948, concluding that Railways had the jurisdiction to construct the lines and draw power, as they had obtained necessary permissions. The court quashed UPSEB's notice and allowed the construction, dismissing UPSEB's petition. The decision emphasized the legal framework supporting Railways' actions and the lack of necessity for UPSEB's permission in this context.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Authority to Construct Transmission Lines - Jurisdiction of Railways - Railways Act, 1989, Sections 11(a), 11(g) - Railways were authorized to construct transmission lines for their own use under the Railways Act, 1989, and had obtained necessary permissions from the Central Government. The court held that the action of Railways was legal and within their jurisdiction (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Northern Railways had the authority to construct transmission lines and draw power from NTPC without UPSEB's permission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed Transferred Case No.37/2001, quashing UPSEB's notice dated 7.9.1999, and dismissed Transferred Case No.38/2001.

Law Points

  • jurisdiction of railways
  • power purchasing agreement
  • construction of transmission lines
  • authority of generating company
  • exemption from licensing requirements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (02) 120

Transferred Case No.37 of 2001 and Transferred Case No.38 of 2001

2012-02-09

H.L. Gokhale, P. Sathasivam

P.P. Malhotra, Rachna Joshi Issar, Pradeep Misra

Union of India through General Manager, Northern Railways

Chairman, UP State Electricity Board & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the legality of construction of transmission lines by Northern Railways.

Remedy Sought

Northern Railways sought to quash UPSEB's notice and validate their construction of transmission lines.

Filing Reason

UPSEB issued a notice threatening to demolish the transmission lines constructed by Railways.

Previous Decisions

Delhi High Court stayed UPSEB's notice and allowed Railways to continue construction.

Issues

Whether Northern Railways had the authority to construct transmission lines and draw power from NTPC without UPSEB's permission. Whether UPSEB's notice was valid in light of the Railways' actions.

Submissions/Arguments

Railways argued that their actions were authorized under the Railways Act, 1989. UPSEB contended that permission from the State Government was necessary under the Electricity Act, 1910.

Ratio Decidendi

Railways were authorized to construct transmission lines and draw power from NTPC under the Railways Act, 1989, and had obtained necessary permissions, making UPSEB's notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The action of the Railways of constructing transmission lines, and drawing power from thermal power plants of NTPC, was perfectly legal. The notice dated 7.9.1999 given by the UPSEB was totally uncalled for, and is required to be quashed and set-aside.

Procedural History

The case originated from two writ petitions filed in different High Courts regarding the same issue, which were transferred to the Supreme Court to avoid conflicting decisions.

Acts & Sections

  • Railways Act, 1989: 11(a), 11(g)
  • Electricity Act, 1948: 43A
  • Electricity Act, 2003: 173
  • Indian Electricity Act, 1910: 27D
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal on Pay Fixation for Ex-Servicemen Due to Misinterpretation of Pay Protection Policy. The court clarified that the protection of pay for ex-servicemen was intended to ensure they did not receive less than their last ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Decree in Contract Dispute Over Tobacco Supply. The court found that the supply of goods and issuance of cheques established a presumption of contract, which the defendant failed to rebut.